Attention: Have only 1 page to see today

Author Topic: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild  (Read 20295 times)

October 06, 2013, 08:51:05 AM
Reply #90

Callyb

  • Information Offline
  • MidWest
  • Posts: 536
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #90 on: October 06, 2013, 08:51:05 AM »
Quote from: "RickK"
It'll be interesting to see if the 2oz resin per sq ft for 1708 ballpark falls within your method's calculations.

Yes, actually. 1 yard of 1708, 50 inches wide is 12.5 square feet which weighs 25 oz (17 oz of biax and 08 oz of mat per yard). 12.5 x 2 = 25, which equals 2.0 ounces of resin per square foot. The reason I prefer to measure is because it is sometimes difficult to figure out your exact square footage of a given piece and that means wasted resin. Please don't take it the wrong way Rick, I don't mean anything other than I just prefer the way I do it.

Quote from: "RickK"
What did you make the fairing compound from?

It is US Composites fairing blend. Honestly Quick fair is my prefered fairing compound because it sands so easy, but I have about half a bucket of this stuff, so why not use it up? I mean who doesn't like sanding? :puker:

As far as the console height goes, I really like the look of a higher console so I will be adding the height and will be at 48 inches high once it is all said and done.

Talk to you later. :salut:
Carl
___________________________

1966 22-2 Flatback w/diver door (perpetual rebuild) w/Mercury 150

1997 Osprey 245 w/Twin 150 Evinrudes

October 06, 2013, 10:10:33 AM
Reply #91

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11327
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #91 on: October 06, 2013, 10:10:33 AM »
You gave us exactly what we needed - a comparison and both seem to be equal. Gives everyone choices. Thanks.
So, some questions - do you pour the batch on top of all 3 layers and work it through or do it one layer at a time and stack it up?  When done, do you lay all 3 layers on the area at once or peel it apart and lam them one at a time?
Still learning here.  :salut:

Only reason I'm keeping my console the same height is so I don't have to buy another cover for the boat.

Looks good  :thumleft:
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

October 06, 2013, 11:11:43 AM
Reply #92

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11327
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #92 on: October 06, 2013, 11:11:43 AM »
Quote from: "Callyb"
It is US Composites fairing blend. Honestly Quick fair is my prefered fairing compound because it sands so easy, but I have about half a bucket of this stuff, so why not use it up? I mean who doesn't like sanding? :puker:
I know I'm going to have a lot of it  :shock:
So is their blend a powder you mix with your resin?  I can't use any epoxy based fairing compounds because I'm going to gelcoat so I might have to create my own - I heard 50% talc, 30% balloons and 20% wood flour is a nice easy mixture to sand.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

October 06, 2013, 11:20:48 AM
Reply #93

Callyb

  • Information Offline
  • MidWest
  • Posts: 536
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #93 on: October 06, 2013, 11:20:48 AM »
Quote from: "RickK"
So, some questions - do you pour the batch on top of all 3 layers and work it through or do it one layer at a time and stack it up? When done, do you lay all 3 layers on the area at once or peel it apart and lam them one at a time?

I wet them out one at a time. However, after the first layer I wet out the next on top of the first and so on. As I add layers I use a laminate roller before I add resin to the top (dry) layer to get any excess resin pushed out from between the layers. Then I will add resin to that layer and work it in and repeat the process again. Once all of the layers are wet out I roll them entire lamination up (on the larger pieces I'll roll from both ends so that I can work from the middle out) and place it as one piece.

I hope that makes sense... :scratch:

Also, I posted this link over in Capt. Koz's thread. It is time lapse, so there is some key parts missing. It may help supplement my explanation though.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-2eUZ4qQps

Quote from: "RickK"
So is their blend a powder you mix with your resin?
Yes. And also I forgot that you are doing polyester... :oops: Anywhere that you are not going to gelcoat you can use epoxy based fairing compounds. The issue is poly not sticking to epoxy very well, not the other way around.

Good conversation going Rick. Thank you :!:  :salut:
Carl
___________________________

1966 22-2 Flatback w/diver door (perpetual rebuild) w/Mercury 150

1997 Osprey 245 w/Twin 150 Evinrudes

October 06, 2013, 12:41:53 PM
Reply #94

dirtwheelsfl

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 808
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #94 on: October 06, 2013, 12:41:53 PM »
Mucho clean!        Do those sandpaper discs youre using have the plastic film on the back you peel off before sticking to the pad?     Those little round pieces of plastic (folded in half) work great for dragging fairing compound over outside radii like you've got on the console. Kinda tricky but....

October 06, 2013, 09:36:06 PM
Reply #95

Callyb

  • Information Offline
  • MidWest
  • Posts: 536
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #95 on: October 06, 2013, 09:36:06 PM »
Quote from: "dirtwheelsfl"
Mucho clean!        Do those sandpaper discs youre using have the plastic film on the back you peel off before sticking to the pad?     Those little round pieces of plastic (folded in half) work great for dragging fairing compound over outside radii like you've got on the console. Kinda tricky but....
Thank you DW. Unfortunately, I have hook and loop discs. Anywhere that I can, I prefer to bulk up the fairing compound on the corners and go over it with the router with a round over bit. On the places I can't get with the router, I have an assortment of quartered pvc pipes that I use for shaping and sanding.
Carl
___________________________

1966 22-2 Flatback w/diver door (perpetual rebuild) w/Mercury 150

1997 Osprey 245 w/Twin 150 Evinrudes

October 07, 2013, 06:51:37 AM
Reply #96

Callyb

  • Information Offline
  • MidWest
  • Posts: 536
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #96 on: October 07, 2013, 06:51:37 AM »
This link is a very good write-up for installing through hull fittings. I figured I would post it here for all of us, but also so I don't loose it.

http://www.pbase.com/mainecruising/backing_blocks&page=1
Carl
___________________________

1966 22-2 Flatback w/diver door (perpetual rebuild) w/Mercury 150

1997 Osprey 245 w/Twin 150 Evinrudes

October 07, 2013, 12:30:23 PM
Reply #97

gran398

  • Information Offline
  • Purgatory
  • Posts: 7440
    • http://www.ascottrhodes.com
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #97 on: October 07, 2013, 12:30:23 PM »
Looking real nice :salut:

October 17, 2013, 09:44:47 AM
Reply #98

Callyb

  • Information Offline
  • MidWest
  • Posts: 536
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #98 on: October 17, 2013, 09:44:47 AM »
I am having a hard time deciding how to do my stringers and would like some input from you guys please.

First off, I am going to install new trapezoid stringers, only I am raising the sole height. What I am on the fence about is if there will be any ill (ie. stress) effects from not keeping the trapezoid. What it really boils down to is the ease of building my molds. I still have the stringers that i could just use as a template (and are junk) and it would be easier just to add the height by just putting a square on top of the original shape. What I am worried about is the concentration of stress at the transition from the square (top) portion to the slanted sides of the trapezoid.

The green represents the additional height.


Thanks in advance!
Carl
___________________________

1966 22-2 Flatback w/diver door (perpetual rebuild) w/Mercury 150

1997 Osprey 245 w/Twin 150 Evinrudes

October 17, 2013, 10:36:38 AM
Reply #99

slvrlng

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1817
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #99 on: October 17, 2013, 10:36:38 AM »
Keep the trapezoid shape. I agree that the "notch" at the transition could be a weaker area. Are you planning on going something like Rickks method? That seemed to work quite well!
Lewis
       1983 222 Osprey "Slipaway"
       1973 19-6 "Emily Lynn"
      

October 17, 2013, 01:34:23 PM
Reply #100

dburr

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 890
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #100 on: October 17, 2013, 01:34:23 PM »
Carl why not just add to the bottom of the old stringer to build up the form?  Couple pieces of Formica glued to the bottom of the old stringers to give you the height you want a should not be to hard yeah?
Dave

88 222 Osprey
00 Yamaha OX66 150
CAS # 2590

October 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM
Reply #101

CLM65

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1394
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #101 on: October 17, 2013, 02:13:48 PM »
Carl,

I had that exact same question a few weeks ago.  The recommendation I got from Eugene Sun was to keep the trapezoid shape.  I ended up making molds for the "extension caps" of my stringers (I am raising them about 3").

Craig
Craig

2002 205 Osprey, 200 HP Yamaha OX66


1967 22-2 Flatback (Rebuild in progress)

October 17, 2013, 05:03:12 PM
Reply #102

dirtwheelsfl

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 808
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #102 on: October 17, 2013, 05:03:12 PM »
Id keep the trapezoid continuous.   Easier to make for sure.     Id probably just use a 2x6 for the bottom of the mold (top of stringer) and then rip your bevels down some plywood to get the trap shape and screw right to the 2x....

October 18, 2013, 08:18:56 AM
Reply #103

Callyb

  • Information Offline
  • MidWest
  • Posts: 536
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #103 on: October 18, 2013, 08:18:56 AM »
Thank you guys for your responses. :salut: I will keep the trapezoid shape.

slvrlng, Rick's stringers are what made me decide to go this route. I agree his came out super deluxe. The difference is I plan on making mine ona male mold. My logic in this is I can build the molds to the hull shape and have less trimming (hopefully none) on the backside. Another option I am toying with is pouring the foam for the stringers in the hull and using the foam for the mold. Not 100% sure about that yet...

Edit: If I go with pouring the foam first, the lamination will be like this. It gets rid of the taping.


dburr, That would be a very simple solution. Thanks!

DW, That is pretty much what I had planned on, wrapped in plastic.

Quote from: "CLM65"
Carl,

I had that exact same question a few weeks ago.  The recommendation I got from Eugene Sun was to keep the trapezoid shape.  I ended up making molds for the "extension caps" of my stringers (I am raising them about 3").

Craig

Craig, Capt Matt had also recommended 3 inches... I had not planned on going that high, but that seems to be the magic number. Did Eugene give you that number or does that seem to be what it takes to keep the cockpit self draining with an offset motor, livewell, etc.?

Thanks again guys!
Carl
___________________________

1966 22-2 Flatback w/diver door (perpetual rebuild) w/Mercury 150

1997 Osprey 245 w/Twin 150 Evinrudes

October 18, 2013, 10:08:52 AM
Reply #104

gran398

  • Information Offline
  • Purgatory
  • Posts: 7440
    • http://www.ascottrhodes.com
Re: 1966 22-2 Diver Rebuild
« Reply #104 on: October 18, 2013, 10:08:52 AM »
Fellas,

Spoke with Eugene regarding flatback deck height, etc. Here is his input.

The deck height should be 3.5 inches above original in order to self bail. That assumes a closed transom with porta-bracket and a 175 etc. four stroke. They performed inertia/fulcrum/weight calculations to arrive at that number.

He also advises that the fuel tank be positioned well forward. On Shipoke's rebuilds the front portion of the tank extends into the area under the original forward casting deck.

Hope this helps :salut:

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal