Attention: Have 2 pages to see today

Author Topic: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild  (Read 36048 times)

March 20, 2014, 10:52:01 PM
Reply #195

fishinonthebrain

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 373
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #195 on: March 20, 2014, 10:52:01 PM »
I like your transom layout.
1987 222CCP current rebuild.




March 27, 2014, 08:30:04 PM
Reply #196

Aswaff400

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 1627
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #196 on: March 27, 2014, 08:30:04 PM »
ok, heres the latest thing ive been pondering about... to put a casting deck, or have an open bow with no casting deck...

with the casting deck at about the original height. only about 8 inches higher than the main deck... gunnel cap comes just below my knee at the bow


the gunnel cap comes just above my knee at the bow.... not a whole lot of height difference, still low enough to throw a net over...  ill still have the big hatch, and then i could run about a 48 inch long coffin box for more storage/cooler capacity...



what do y'all think?? :scratch:
Aaron
1996 200 Osprey SOLD
1968 22-2 Flatback SOLD
1993 210 Explorer SOLD
1991 Fountain 31TE SOLD
1989 Fountain 12-meter SOLD
1992 Talon F-20 SOLD
2021 Fountain 38TE QUAD 400's

March 27, 2014, 08:38:25 PM
Reply #197

seabob4

  • Information Offline
  • Rigging Master
  • Posts: 9087
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #197 on: March 27, 2014, 08:38:25 PM »
I vote raise the casting deck up to just shy of the cap...hell, raise it all the way up and glass to the underside of the cap (inwale)...that would look sweet, be functional (a true casting deck)...

Yep, that's what I would do.  But it would have to move forward, don't know if you have enough overhang to mate up with a vertical from the cockpit sole...


Corner of 520 and A1A...

March 27, 2014, 09:14:36 PM
Reply #198

gran398

  • Information Offline
  • Purgatory
  • Posts: 7440
    • http://www.ascottrhodes.com
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #198 on: March 27, 2014, 09:14:36 PM »
Everybody's different, and my thinking is just the opposite....level deck to the bow.

 Like the decks on Contenders. No step-up to remember, nothing to trip over. You've already raised the deck five inches....would be cool to have a lot of freeboard somewhere...and no better place than up at the bow. Working anchors in the slop, laying into a big tarpon from up there...a lot of leverage.

Even throwing a cast net in rough conditions....you're safer INSIDE the boat.

Okay.... its 1-1 in the first inning! :flower:

March 27, 2014, 09:29:27 PM
Reply #199

seabob4

  • Information Offline
  • Rigging Master
  • Posts: 9087
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #199 on: March 27, 2014, 09:29:27 PM »
Scotty, if there were a vertical inwale, I'd agree with you.  But as it stands, lowering the deck to the sole will create an uncomfortable lean from where your feet are (the sole) to where your body would rest (the cap).

That's my reasoning...


Corner of 520 and A1A...

March 27, 2014, 09:31:21 PM
Reply #200

BradleyD

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 24
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #200 on: March 27, 2014, 09:31:21 PM »
I agree with seabob. Both look good so aesthetics would go either way but the gain in height/sight advantage would be worth it for me. The extra storage below the deck would be a plus as well.  If it's rough and trying to throw a net just step down to the main deck and throw,  but then again if it's too rough to throw a net I'd probably be staying at the dock.

March 27, 2014, 10:03:44 PM
Reply #201

Aswaff400

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 1627
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #201 on: March 27, 2014, 10:03:44 PM »
i might add, either way i go, there will be thick coaming bolsters wrapped around the bow and there will be a bulkhead for an anchor locker in the bow...
Aaron
1996 200 Osprey SOLD
1968 22-2 Flatback SOLD
1993 210 Explorer SOLD
1991 Fountain 31TE SOLD
1989 Fountain 12-meter SOLD
1992 Talon F-20 SOLD
2021 Fountain 38TE QUAD 400's

March 27, 2014, 10:11:14 PM
Reply #202

dirtwheelsfl

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 808
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #202 on: March 27, 2014, 10:11:14 PM »
I like how mine turned out  8)

If you get dead set on a flat deck i think youd need to do extend the cap back to where youre not leaning on the hullside to reach the gunnel like Bob said.    

I also dont like a tall casting deck with a big step.    

I would do like the old 23 Intrepids.   They had a small (4" or so) raised deck with center fishbox.    Short enough to keep you in the boat and still add alot of space underneath.   Then Id probably do a half height bulkhead on top of the deck directly under the front o the cap to keep an anchor and whatnot.   Then between the step and console is a nice spot to put a cooler sideways..


only pic I could find..    http://www.thehulltruth.com/attachments ... boat-5.jpg

March 27, 2014, 10:16:25 PM
Reply #203

gran398

  • Information Offline
  • Purgatory
  • Posts: 7440
    • http://www.ascottrhodes.com
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #203 on: March 27, 2014, 10:16:25 PM »
Looking back at the pics, see where you're coming from.

Would like to see a pic of Aaron standing directly behind the center of the bow cap, middle of the curvature....behind where the bow cleat would go.

March 27, 2014, 10:17:53 PM
Reply #204

Aswaff400

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 1627
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #204 on: March 27, 2014, 10:17:53 PM »
scott, ill see if i can get a pic...

dirt, your boat is actually what got me thinking bout going with a flat deck... that and i started to get used to the contender. LOL.

i like the coffin box thats on the contender. i dont know if it would fit between the legs on my tower.ill have to measure it when we get it back from service... i know the smallest frigid rigid coffin box will fit
Aaron
1996 200 Osprey SOLD
1968 22-2 Flatback SOLD
1993 210 Explorer SOLD
1991 Fountain 31TE SOLD
1989 Fountain 12-meter SOLD
1992 Talon F-20 SOLD
2021 Fountain 38TE QUAD 400's

March 27, 2014, 10:18:08 PM
Reply #205

Georgie

  • Information Offline
  • Mechanical Master
  • Posts: 481
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #205 on: March 27, 2014, 10:18:08 PM »
I'm with DW here, Aaron....the flatback is not a big water boat, so in basic concept you're not supposed to need or want high gunwales.  In addition, the casting deck functions two very important ways...MASSIVE/CRITICAL storage area, and excellent fishability. Unless  you have a very specific use/boating style planned, keep the deck and just raise or lower it if you want to fit your own measurements.   :salut:
Ryan

1979 246 CCC

1987 Wellcraft 18 Fisherman

March 27, 2014, 11:16:16 PM
Reply #206

gran398

  • Information Offline
  • Purgatory
  • Posts: 7440
    • http://www.ascottrhodes.com
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #206 on: March 27, 2014, 11:16:16 PM »


Neat boat DW :salut:

March 28, 2014, 02:06:47 AM
Reply #207

Blue Agave

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #207 on: March 28, 2014, 02:06:47 AM »
Go with option A, the first photo.  You're not going to be out in the middle of the bay when its blowing 15-20, you'll be in the skinny water.   :salut:

1975 19-6
3.0 EFI Mercury 150 4S
"Don't count the days make the days count." - Muhammad Ali

March 28, 2014, 08:45:51 AM
Reply #208

Callyb

  • Information Offline
  • MidWest
  • Posts: 536
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #208 on: March 28, 2014, 08:45:51 AM »
I would go with the raised casting deck.

One other thing to consider is, IMO, I am pretty sure that the casting deck is actually structural to the hull. I think you would have some undesired flex in the bow without it, even with the deck raised 5 inches.

Just some food for thought.
Carl
___________________________

1966 22-2 Flatback w/diver door (perpetual rebuild) w/Mercury 150

1997 Osprey 245 w/Twin 150 Evinrudes

March 28, 2014, 09:12:39 AM
Reply #209

seabob4

  • Information Offline
  • Rigging Master
  • Posts: 9087
Re: 1968 22-2 FB rebuild
« Reply #209 on: March 28, 2014, 09:12:39 AM »
So did we make your decision for ya, Aaron? :thumright:


Corner of 520 and A1A...

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal