Attention: Have 2 pages to see today

Author Topic: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?  (Read 4596 times)

September 20, 2011, 12:38:24 PM
Reply #15

fitz73222

  • Information Offline
  • Mechanical Master
  • Posts: 1957
    • http://www.hudson-technologies.com/.
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #15 on: September 20, 2011, 12:38:24 PM »
Quote from: "Boatdood"
This is great. One guy says he's not taking the bait, even though he just did, and another has an engine that puts money in his wallet. Gotta get me one of those!

You are absolutely right; I did take the bait. Did you intend to make a point of this or just start a little firestorm? You have had 17 posts since 2009 so you must have been helping out someother forum that I'm sure misses you by now...
1973 Aquasport 22-2, twin 115 Mercs
2000 Baycraft 175 flats boat, 60 Bigfoot Merc
1968 Boston Whaler 13, 25 Yamaha (project)
1966 Orlando Clipper 13, 9.9 Merc

September 20, 2011, 03:30:49 PM
Reply #16

gran398

  • Information Offline
  • Purgatory
  • Posts: 7440
    • http://www.ascottrhodes.com
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2011, 03:30:49 PM »
The Seamark 20's I've been running all summer are rigged with Suzi 115 4 strokes. I've run Jessie's Suzi 140 4s. And I will say this ...the hole shot on those two motors is very impressive. Not quite a two stroke hole shot... But pretty close.

And yep Jess, and although you're new to all of this...the quicker you're...aw, never mind :lol:

September 20, 2011, 04:23:28 PM
Reply #17

Circle Hooked

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 2130
    • http://www.theaquasportboatclub.com/index.php
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #17 on: September 20, 2011, 04:23:28 PM »
Quote from: "Boatdood"
This is great. One guy says he's not taking the bait, even though he just did, and another has an engine that puts money in his wallet. Gotta get me one of those!

 :scratch:
Scott
1997 225 Explorer

September 20, 2011, 04:50:13 PM
Reply #18

Capt. Bob

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Global Moderator
  • Posts: 6446
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #18 on: September 20, 2011, 04:50:13 PM »
I believe he and his son are both veteran Forum Members. My gut feeling is this is just a spirited, thought provoking exercise.

Let's see where it goes, shall we?
]
Capt. Bob
1991 210 Walkaround
2018 Yamaha 150 4 Stroke
"Reef or Madness IV"

September 20, 2011, 05:07:43 PM
Reply #19

seagate

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 169
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #19 on: September 20, 2011, 05:07:43 PM »
We all know any motor can break down what I was trying to say was with my 4 stroke 140 I get better range by not using as much gas as I did with my 2 stroke.I'm not saying 2 strokes are bad My 175 was a 1985 for goodness sake how bad could it be.I'm not going to compare other motors OMC,Mercury,Yami I never owned one.I have always used Johnson and now Suzuki by default.But If I was going to re-power today I would look hard at the Suzuki 4 stroke line up before anything else.We all like what we like I just want to enjoy the water as much as I can and go fishing.

September 20, 2011, 05:59:46 PM
Reply #20

Boatdood

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 39
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #20 on: September 20, 2011, 05:59:46 PM »
Quote from: "fitz73222"
Quote from: "Boatdood"
This is great. One guy says he's not taking the bait, even though he just did, and another has an engine that puts money in his wallet. Gotta get me one of those!

You are absolutely right; I did take the bait. Did you intend to make a point of this or just start a little firestorm? You have had 17 posts since 2009 so you must have been helping out someother forum that I'm sure misses you by now...

Fitz, my intent was stated in the original post. What is the minimum post count required to poke a little fun?

September 20, 2011, 06:21:33 PM
Reply #21

Boatdood

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 39
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #21 on: September 20, 2011, 06:21:33 PM »
Ok guys, seriously I like a good discussion about boats and the motors that push them, no matter the strokes. I also like to poke a little fun now and then too. Nothing serious and I certainly don't intend to insult anyone. The four stroke/two stroke discussion seems to be a good topic to stir the emotions though so to get things rolling I thought I'd throw out the hook.

My history and experience in the boat biz goes back to 1970 when I started as the yard boy at the Outboard Shop in North Charleston, SC. That's where the first Scout boat was built by the way. They were an Aquasport dealer in those days so I had the distinct opportunity to see a new 1970 Aquasport. A 17CC was a big, wide 17 footer in those days and didn't have a problem at all with engine weight on the transom. Of course that was with the good old Evinrude two strokes we sold back in the day. Evinrude built as big as a 115 hp which weighed in just over three hundred pounds. In comparison today's Evinrude 115 is 369 lbs. Like most of us two strokes have gained a few pounds through the years while the four strokes are on a diet. Mercury's 4 stroke 115 for instance is down to 386 lbs. making it only 17 lbs heavier than the lightweight Evinrude. Not much difference really. Speaking of weight there are examples out there amongst the various builders where the four strokes are actually weighing in less than the two stroke counterpart. Yamaha's new 300 hp 4 stroke weighs in at only 558 lbs. Does anyone know what Evinrude's old V8 two stroke 300hp weighed? My point being the weight issue is going away in the stroke controversy, and that's a good thing. Hauling weight takes energy, and energy costs money.

For the sake of discussion though, a few two stroke facts:

Two strokes have a rapid wear zone in their cylinders.
Two stroke pistons run hotter.
Conventional two strokes are gasoline cooled.
Two strokes actually do have an intake and exhaust cycle.
Two strokes do have valves.
And, two stroke outboards have more moving parts than a four stroke. Figure that one out.

September 20, 2011, 07:05:26 PM
Reply #22

Capt. Bob

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Global Moderator
  • Posts: 6446
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #22 on: September 20, 2011, 07:05:26 PM »
Well there you have it.
I should have guessed that Boatdood's demeanor was similar to mine.
]
Capt. Bob
1991 210 Walkaround
2018 Yamaha 150 4 Stroke
"Reef or Madness IV"

September 20, 2011, 07:18:02 PM
Reply #23

MarshMarlowe196

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 976
    • http://www.keywestboatsforum.com
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #23 on: September 20, 2011, 07:18:02 PM »
Quote from: "Capt. Bob"
Well there you have it.
I should have guessed that Boatdood's demeanor was similar to mine.

Now I know why I like you Bob. That GPS didn't hurt either  :D
Key West 1720 / Yam C90

Sold: 1973 Aquasport 19-6

September 20, 2011, 08:01:05 PM
Reply #24

gran398

  • Information Offline
  • Purgatory
  • Posts: 7440
    • http://www.ascottrhodes.com
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #24 on: September 20, 2011, 08:01:05 PM »
Quote from: "John Jones"
I have owned both.  I have ridden on many more of both of all brands including a buddy that re-powered with twin eTec 130's last year.  

If I were re-powering my decision would be based on the best deal and warranty.  For the time being my old '97 Yamaha will have to do.


They are all real close now. Your thoughts make great sense.

Sang the praises of the 115-140 4s Suzi's...Conversely....and although have always enjoyed running Yamaha products....the F250 is unimpressive.

23 Hydrasport I fish on...Loaded for grouper fishing, would barely get on plane with four guys on board, full 200 gallon tank. Actually, dangerous in the inlet. Factory rigged, recommended for "best mileage, etc."

NO low-end torque. Took hours to get on plane. Not only that...stays in the shop, little nitpicky things.

As you said JJ....best deal, best warranty....but get one to start with that is actually fit for the purpose. For him...the F250 is a dog.

September 20, 2011, 08:23:07 PM
Reply #25

GoneFission

  • Information Offline
  • Mechanical Master
  • Posts: 3479
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #25 on: September 20, 2011, 08:23:07 PM »
Quote from: "Boatdood"
For the sake of discussion though, a few two stroke facts:

Two strokes have a rapid wear zone in their cylinders.
Two stroke pistons run hotter.
Conventional two strokes are gasoline cooled.
Two strokes actually do have an intake and exhaust cycle.
Two strokes do have valves.
And, two stroke outboards have more moving parts than a four stroke. Figure that one out.

OK, time for a fact-check:

Wear zones - depends on cylinder base material, rings, and piston material and clearances.  Remember Detroit Diesel truck engines are 2 strokes and seem to run a really long time...  

Runs hotter - depends on piston cooling and compression ratio.  High compression engines have higher piston temps, but usually have oil jet cooling on the bottom face of the piston.  4 strokes are normally higher compression than 2 strokes, but 2 strokes fire twice as often.  

Two strokes are gasoline cooled - then why do you need a water pump?  Sorry, this one does not pass the snicker test.

Two strokes have an intake and exhaust cycle - so do rotary engines, miller cycle engines, and every other gas powered engine - cuz you gotta bring the air in a force it out.  But the intake and exhaust in a 2 stroke happen in the same turn of the engine and the cylinder fires on every RPM.  Four strokes (Otto cycle) fire every other RPM.

Two strokes have valves - yes, they have reed valves to prevent back-feed into the crankcase.  These are passive valves, not articulated by a camshaft.
Cap'n John
1980 22-2 CCP
Mercury 200 Optimax 
ASPA0345M80I
"Gone Fission"
ClassicAquasport Member #209


September 20, 2011, 10:35:11 PM
Reply #26

Capt Matt

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 791
    • http://www.captmattmitchell.com
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #26 on: September 20, 2011, 10:35:11 PM »
What is better?, outboards are like boats there is no perfect one for every situation, its all about compromise and trade off's. No matter what you chose run it till the warranty is up and get rid of them as quick as possible and hopefully to someone you don't know.
Capt Matt
www.captmattmitchell.com
Light tackle sportfishing

September 20, 2011, 11:32:24 PM
Reply #27

seabob4

  • Information Offline
  • Rigging Master
  • Posts: 9087
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #27 on: September 20, 2011, 11:32:24 PM »
Quote from: "Capt Matt"
What is better?, outboards are like boats there is no perfect one for every situation, its all about compromise and trade off's. No matter what you chose run it till the warranty is up and get rid of them as quick as possible and hopefully to someone you don't know.
Capt Matt

...and lives far, far away...


Corner of 520 and A1A...

September 21, 2011, 11:22:18 AM
Reply #28

Boatdood

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 39
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #28 on: September 21, 2011, 11:22:18 AM »
Quote from: "GoneFission"
Quote from: "Boatdood"
For the sake of discussion though, a few two stroke facts:

Two strokes have a rapid wear zone in their cylinders.
Two stroke pistons run hotter.
Conventional two strokes are gasoline cooled.
Two strokes actually do have an intake and exhaust cycle.
Two strokes do have valves.
And, two stroke outboards have more moving parts than a four stroke. Figure that one out.

OK, time for a fact-check:

Wear zones - depends on cylinder base material, rings, and piston material and clearances.  Remember Detroit Diesel truck engines are 2 strokes and seem to run a really long time...  

Runs hotter - depends on piston cooling and compression ratio.  High compression engines have higher piston temps, but usually have oil jet cooling on the bottom face of the piston.  4 strokes are normally higher compression than 2 strokes, but 2 strokes fire twice as often.  

Two strokes are gasoline cooled - then why do you need a water pump?  Sorry, this one does not pass the snicker test.

Two strokes have an intake and exhaust cycle - so do rotary engines, miller cycle engines, and every other gas powered engine - cuz you gotta bring the air in a force it out.  But the intake and exhaust in a 2 stroke happen in the same turn of the engine and the cylinder fires on every RPM.  Four strokes (Otto cycle) fire every other RPM.

Two strokes have valves - yes, they have reed valves to prevent back-feed into the crankcase.  These are passive valves, not articulated by a camshaft.


Time for a check of the facts in the fact check.

Wear zones. So did you support or deny that fact? It's not really clear.

Pistons run hotter. Again not really sure from your response. Keep in mind we are talking about outboard engines here.

Conventional two strokes are gasoline cooled. I'm not sure what a snicker test is but notice that I did not exclude the water pump or the water cooling, only stating that they are gasoline cooled. If you deny that they are I'd like to hear a good reason for discussion.

Two strokes have an intake and exhaust cycle. I see you agree with me on this one.

Two strokes have valves. I see you agree with me on this one as well. I'm not sure what a passive valve is as opposed to an active one, or what you mean by articulated, but we agree on the valves issue. I've often heard it claimed that they do not have them which is why I brought it up.

Two strokes have more moving parts. I see you steered clear of that one.

Seriously there is some pretty good and interesting discussion material here if anyone is inclined. It may help to establish a more informed opinion with regard to the 2 stroke/4stroke debate.

September 21, 2011, 11:49:52 AM
Reply #29

fitz73222

  • Information Offline
  • Mechanical Master
  • Posts: 1957
    • http://www.hudson-technologies.com/.
Re: So How is a Four Stroke so much better than a Two Stroke?
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2011, 11:49:52 AM »
Quote from: "Boatdood"
Quote from: "GoneFission"
Quote from: "Boatdood"
For the sake of discussion though, a few two stroke facts:

Two strokes have a rapid wear zone in their cylinders.
Two stroke pistons run hotter.
Conventional two strokes are gasoline cooled.
Two strokes actually do have an intake and exhaust cycle.
Two strokes do have valves.
And, two stroke outboards have more moving parts than a four stroke. Figure that one out.

OK, time for a fact-check:

Wear zones - depends on cylinder base material, rings, and piston material and clearances.  Remember Detroit Diesel truck engines are 2 strokes and seem to run a really long time...  

Runs hotter - depends on piston cooling and compression ratio.  High compression engines have higher piston temps, but usually have oil jet cooling on the bottom face of the piston.  4 strokes are normally higher compression than 2 strokes, but 2 strokes fire twice as often.  

Two strokes are gasoline cooled - then why do you need a water pump?  Sorry, this one does not pass the snicker test.

Two strokes have an intake and exhaust cycle - so do rotary engines, miller cycle engines, and every other gas powered engine - cuz you gotta bring the air in a force it out.  But the intake and exhaust in a 2 stroke happen in the same turn of the engine and the cylinder fires on every RPM.  Four strokes (Otto cycle) fire every other RPM.

Two strokes have valves - yes, they have reed valves to prevent back-feed into the crankcase.  These are passive valves, not articulated by a camshaft.


Time for a check of the facts in the fact check.

Wear zones. So did you support or deny that fact? It's not really clear.

Pistons run hotter. Again not really sure from your response. Keep in mind we are talking about outboard engines here.

Conventional two strokes are gasoline cooled. I'm not sure what a snicker test is but notice that I did not exclude the water pump or the water cooling, only stating that they are gasoline cooled. If you deny that they are I'd like to hear a good reason for discussion.

Two strokes have an intake and exhaust cycle. I see you agree with me on this one.

Two strokes have valves. I see you agree with me on this one as well. I'm not sure what a passive valve is as opposed to an active one, or what you mean by articulated, but we agree on the valves issue. I've often heard it claimed that they do not have them which is why I brought it up.

Two strokes have more moving parts. I see you steered clear of that one.

Seriously there is some pretty good and interesting discussion material here if anyone is inclined. It may help to establish a more informed opinion with regard to the 2 stroke/4stroke debate.

Man what is your point with this dialog? You are attempting to create an argument or mearly expound on your outboard prowess on a subject that is no longer relevent to todays situation. The two cycle engine has its days numbered because of its poor enviromental contribution. As the CAFE standards continue to tighten, the 2 cycle engine will go by the wayside in this country. The market for the 2 cycle engine is still very strong in Asia until they start to care about their environment.
1973 Aquasport 22-2, twin 115 Mercs
2000 Baycraft 175 flats boat, 60 Bigfoot Merc
1968 Boston Whaler 13, 25 Yamaha (project)
1966 Orlando Clipper 13, 9.9 Merc

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal