You reached the limit of pages to see for today

Author Topic: 1987 17' Osprey  (Read 4267 times)

April 23, 2008, 09:15:47 AM
Reply #15

gchop

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 17
fuel fill
« Reply #15 on: April 23, 2008, 09:15:47 AM »
It is definetly pinched. I didnt find it to be foamed or attatched in any way.
I think I cut the hose in a couple of places to get it out. The new hose was then greased heavily and snaked back into place.I had to cut a new hole which i covered with a deck plate in the gunnel to get this done. It all worked out fine.

George

April 23, 2008, 10:27:00 AM
Reply #16

wwwcre8r

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 35
    • http://www.cre8r.com
(No subject)
« Reply #16 on: April 23, 2008, 10:27:00 AM »
Thanks for the info... I *hope* to not have to cut any holes... but in case I do, I guess another access plate wouldn't be the worst thing that could happen, eh?

I wonder if anyone has any deck-off pictures showing how the fuel fill hose was laid in place on an AS 170... so I can visualize how the hose may be situated?
1987 Aquasport 170 Osprey, \'87 Mercury Mariner 115 L6

July 08, 2008, 10:17:42 PM
Reply #17

wwwcre8r

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 35
    • http://www.cre8r.com
(No subject)
« Reply #17 on: July 08, 2008, 10:17:42 PM »
For anyone that cares to see how this turned out, I posted some pics in another related thread. Thanks to all for the help/ advice too!!!

I finally got the old fuel fill hose out and the new one in!

http://www.classicaquasport.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2573
1987 Aquasport 170 Osprey, \'87 Mercury Mariner 115 L6

July 22, 2008, 02:16:30 PM
Reply #18

MJB

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 95
(No subject)
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2008, 02:16:30 PM »
Just getting caught up after being out of town, you may have already made the decision but thought I might add my .02 worth.  

My 170 had an 86/87 115 when I bought it last summer before my rebuild started -- motor weighed 320# according to info I was able to find.  I put the boat in the water to check where the scuppers were and both scuppers were below the waterline without additional weight (gear/people).

I thought about repowering with a 90 HP 4 stroke Suzuki but steered away because of the weight (416# according to manufacturer) which was more than the old motor.

So I decided 2 stroke was the only way, and settled on a Yamaha 90 2 Stroke which weighs ~262# according to the manufacturer.

I opted for a lighter motor in an effort to keep the scuppers as high as possible.  I have yet to spalsh this boat, still rebuilding, but with the new transom and deck, the scuppers measure about an inch higher than before.    

Good luck, hope it helps.
Mike
AB, NC
1976 Aquasport 170
1988 MAKO 285

July 22, 2008, 02:57:04 PM
Reply #19

wwwcre8r

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 35
    • http://www.cre8r.com
(No subject)
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2008, 02:57:04 PM »
I too am worried about how low the transom lies, my scuppers were below the waterline (barely), I got water in the boat due to crud stuck in the self bailing floating ball-type scuppers.

I'll replace those, I wonder which are the best scuppers for such an application?

Since I replaced the fuel tank, I'm hoping that shifts a lot of weight forward... keeping my fingers crossed.

When my Mariner 115 goes... i too am looking at a Yamaha 90hp 2 stroke as a replacement (60 lbs. lighter).
1987 Aquasport 170 Osprey, \'87 Mercury Mariner 115 L6

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal