Attention: Have only 1 page to see today

Author Topic: Thought you guys may enjoy this  (Read 2175 times)

July 01, 2010, 11:22:07 AM
Reply #15

gran398

  • Information Offline
  • Purgatory
  • Posts: 7440
    • http://www.ascottrhodes.com
Re: Thought you guys may enjoy this
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2010, 11:22:07 AM »
Wow, that is some ride....thanks for the post, GF!

JJ, speaking of fuel.....wonder how many mpg that girl gets?

And finally....a trivia question....how far does the average cruise ship travel on one gallon of fuel?

(Hint....I know the answer... :bounce:)

It will flip you out.

July 01, 2010, 12:48:56 PM
Reply #16

John Jones

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 2829
Re: Thought you guys may enjoy this
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2010, 12:48:56 PM »
Quote
The two Cat 3512 B marine engines are rated at 2250 hp each. At 1925 rpm, her sleek aluminum hull is capable of a 21.9 knot top speed and an 18.5 knot cruise. With approximately 16,750 gallons of fuel, a leisurely cruise of 12 knots gives her an estimated range of 4,100 nm. JANIE is also equipped with zero speed stabilizers from Quantum, so she gives up no comfort at anchor to her deeper, slower rivals in the charter fleet.

About 4 nm/gal  ;)

I have read cruise ship stats but have forgotten.  After seeing the engine room of the Disney Magic I know it's  :shock:
Politics have no relation to morals.
Niccolo Machiavelli

July 01, 2010, 01:37:30 PM
Reply #17

seabob4

  • Information Offline
  • Rigging Master
  • Posts: 9087
Re: Thought you guys may enjoy this
« Reply #17 on: July 01, 2010, 01:37:30 PM »


Corner of 520 and A1A...

July 02, 2010, 05:22:16 AM
Reply #18

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11278
Re: Thought you guys may enjoy this
« Reply #18 on: July 02, 2010, 05:22:16 AM »
Quote from: "seabob4"
Found this on the QE2...
http://www.roblightbody.com/liners/qe-2/QE2_fuel_economy.htm
Those are some confusing stats  :scratch:
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 02, 2010, 07:26:32 AM
Reply #19

John Jones

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 2829
Re: Thought you guys may enjoy this
« Reply #19 on: July 02, 2010, 07:26:32 AM »
At 20 kt. the ship only travels 125 feet per gallon but it's carrying 2915 people so each individual is getting 69 mpg.
Politics have no relation to morals.
Niccolo Machiavelli

July 02, 2010, 07:30:34 AM
Reply #20

John Jones

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 2829
Re: Thought you guys may enjoy this
« Reply #20 on: July 02, 2010, 07:30:34 AM »
Let's run the numbers on the latest model of the Boeing 737-900. The plane burns about 2.4 gallons per nautical mile, and a trip from New York to Los Angeles, California, is about 2,100 nautical miles. So that means it would take about 5,000 gallons of Jet-A fuel to fly coast to coast.

Now let's assume it is configured to hold about 175 people -- and the plane is full -- aren't they all these days? That comes out to 28.5 gallons per passenger. Even if the passengers were all Toyota Prius owners (which get 50 mpg), 28.5 gallons would only get them 1,400 miles down the road. So if the choice is flying -- or driving solo, the airliner wins by a huge margin.

But if you fill the Prius with people -- it becomes competitive with flying. The driving distance between New York and Los Angeles is 2,700 statute miles. That amounts to 54 gallons of gas in the fuel-sipping hybrid. With four people in the car, the Prius wins -- with each passenger using only 13.5 gallons.

As you can plainly see, if you drive a plain old gas-engine car the airliner is more likely to be a more efficient way to travel. If your car gets, say 25 mpg, it will burn 108 gallons to get you to the "Left Coast." With four people inside, your per capita use of fuel is 27 gallons -- or virtually tied with the full 737.

http://askville.amazon.com/miles-gallon ... d=10537954

------------------------------------------------------
Who the heck wants to drive to CA in a Prius packed tighter than the 737 (not to mention 70mph vs. 525mph)?
Politics have no relation to morals.
Niccolo Machiavelli

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal