Attention: Have 2 pages to see today

Author Topic: What the perfect motor for a 170?  (Read 8282 times)

February 14, 2007, 05:51:08 PM
Reply #30

Pat Green

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 15
(No subject)
« Reply #30 on: February 14, 2007, 05:51:08 PM »
Rick, yes my boat has a tunnel about 6 inches wide running starboard to the center of transom with a small sump about 8 x 6 inches.  I installed the two new drains as low as possible to floor about a foot from starboard and port.
1971 17 open fisherman

February 21, 2007, 08:23:31 PM
Reply #31

hunter

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 18
(No subject)
« Reply #31 on: February 21, 2007, 08:23:31 PM »
Miguel maybe you are right I checked my speed with my gps last sunday and toped out at 41 with a little chop.  I guess I was wrong or the colorado river current was pushing me the last time.

February 21, 2007, 08:51:44 PM
Reply #32

Miguel

  • Information Offline
  • Panama
  • Posts: 292
(No subject)
« Reply #32 on: February 21, 2007, 08:51:44 PM »
That could make a difference.....
These hulls are heavy for their size when compared to other 17 footers or even larger bay/flats boats. I believe they were designed to have a terminal speed of about 40mph.  It would take substantial amounts of additional HP to increase speed above that treshold.
Miguel
1985 Osprey 170 / 1992 115HP Mariner
[/url]

February 25, 2007, 08:38:43 AM
Reply #33

DoOver

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 17
(No subject)
« Reply #33 on: February 25, 2007, 08:38:43 AM »
I have a 140 V-4 Johnson on mine and on a calm night going with the tide and me and my wife, GPS said 39.8 mph. It felt like thats about all the hull could do anyway. If I repowered I'd go for a 90 Yam. Less weight. I'm to heavy at the transom at drift.
Brian
72  170 Aquasport
140 Johnson Sold I\'m Hating It!

February 26, 2007, 05:13:03 PM
Reply #34

GoneFission

  • Information Offline
  • Mechanical Master
  • Posts: 3479
Perfect Motor
« Reply #34 on: February 26, 2007, 05:13:03 PM »
Hey, if you're going to raise the deck and move the scuppers and all that, why stop at 115 on that 170?  What you need is MORE POWER!    :twisted:   With 4 liters, 300 HP, and ONLY 604 lbs dry - put one of these on the back - as long as you never stop you will be happy!   :roll:



I can see the Forum signature now:

DamnFastBubba
1974 Aquasport 170
300 HP Suzuki 4 stroke
Sinking soon!
 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Cap'n John
1980 22-2 CCP
Mercury 200 Optimax 
ASPA0345M80I
"Gone Fission"
ClassicAquasport Member #209


February 26, 2007, 07:11:22 PM
Reply #35

gw204

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 106
(No subject)
« Reply #35 on: February 26, 2007, 07:11:22 PM »
Geez man, where have you been?  We have a new leader in the "ridiculously overweight outboard engine" contest....

F350 Yamaha checks in at something like 804 lbs.   :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Brian
St. Leonard, MD
1981 Mako 17
1986 Grady White 227

February 26, 2007, 07:36:45 PM
Reply #36

JimCt

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1848
(No subject)
« Reply #36 on: February 26, 2007, 07:36:45 PM »
But on the other hand, if you want to leave those scuppers where they are...

JimCT
------
\'74 22-2 inboard
HIN:ASPL0953M74J
Chrysler 318
------
\'74 Marshall 22

February 26, 2007, 07:46:56 PM
Reply #37

John Jones

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 2829
(No subject)
« Reply #37 on: February 26, 2007, 07:46:56 PM »
Nice Jim.  Marine Surplus has at least twenty motors of similar vintage hanging from the ceiling of their warehouse.  I didn't notice them until the last time I was there.

since we are on a major derail:

As a teenager I had a Scott Attwater 5HP my old man traded from someone.  At 14 I built my own 8' plywood boat with 3/4 plywood, nails,  and roofing cement.  Damn motor almost sunk it.  It worked a lot better with a paddle.

My youngest son has an OB made by the Martin Boiler Company.  I have not seen it yet and don't know the HP.  He said I could have it if I wanted it but I have enough junk already.
Politics have no relation to morals.
Niccolo Machiavelli

February 26, 2007, 07:57:46 PM
Reply #38

JimCt

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1848
(No subject)
« Reply #38 on: February 26, 2007, 07:57:46 PM »
De-rail?  The man asked for suggestions.

OK, so how 'bout the Scott-Atwater 5?



Seriously though, I think 115 is the edge for a 170.  Weight's the killer with big engines.
JimCT
------
\'74 22-2 inboard
HIN:ASPL0953M74J
Chrysler 318
------
\'74 Marshall 22

February 26, 2007, 08:35:56 PM
Reply #39

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11278
(No subject)
« Reply #39 on: February 26, 2007, 08:35:56 PM »
Quote from: "JimCt"
But on the other hand, if you want to leave those scuppers where they are...


Is that a saltwater engine?  :wink:
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

February 26, 2007, 08:39:12 PM
Reply #40

JimCt

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1848
(No subject)
« Reply #40 on: February 26, 2007, 08:39:12 PM »
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:
JimCT
------
\'74 22-2 inboard
HIN:ASPL0953M74J
Chrysler 318
------
\'74 Marshall 22

February 27, 2007, 05:59:02 AM
Reply #41

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11278
(No subject)
« Reply #41 on: February 27, 2007, 05:59:02 AM »
Quote from: "gw204"
Geez man, where have you been?  We have a new leader in the "ridiculously overweight outboard engine" contest....

F350 Yamaha checks in at something like 804 lbs.   :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

 :shock: That would definitely sink my little boat - imagine backing it down the ramp and the boat stays on the trailer, never floating off, right under water....  :cry:  :lol:

It won't be long before you start seeing these stacked up as "trips" or "quads" on the back of some tournament/go-fast boats.  Let me see, 2 of these=more than my entire 170 with motor today.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal