Attention: Have 2 pages to see today

Author Topic: What the perfect motor for a 170?  (Read 8281 times)

February 07, 2007, 10:24:14 PM
Read 8281 times

gw204

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 106
What the perfect motor for a 170?
« on: February 07, 2007, 10:24:14 PM »
I was just curious as to what you guys think the perfect motor (HP wise) for a 170 would be?  Mine will be used primarily for fishing the Chesapeake Bay and it's tributaries.  I'm not looking to be a speed demon, but I want to be able to turn a few heads when the water is calm enough.   :D

I was thinking of something in the 90 to 115 range.  Specifially Opti or ETEC when the time comes...unless I'm out of money by then.   :D

Anyway, I kinda need to get a general idea about this soon so I can determine how large a transom cutout I need.  So, what do you guys think?

Thanks.
Brian
St. Leonard, MD
1981 Mako 17
1986 Grady White 227

February 07, 2007, 10:28:15 PM
Reply #1

JimCt

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1848
(No subject)
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2007, 10:28:15 PM »
My 170 had a Merc 75 which pushed along at about 32 MPH.  90 will buy you ~40+ and 115 will scare your pants off.
JimCT
------
\'74 22-2 inboard
HIN:ASPL0953M74J
Chrysler 318
------
\'74 Marshall 22

February 08, 2007, 05:44:22 AM
Reply #2

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11278
(No subject)
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2007, 05:44:22 AM »
My 115 Johnson pushes the 170 39.9....
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

February 08, 2007, 07:44:18 AM
Reply #3

JimCt

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1848
(No subject)
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2007, 07:44:18 AM »
Only eight MPH faster than my 75???
JimCT
------
\'74 22-2 inboard
HIN:ASPL0953M74J
Chrysler 318
------
\'74 Marshall 22

February 08, 2007, 11:59:08 AM
Reply #4

bamafaninfl

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 37
(No subject)
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2007, 11:59:08 AM »
90 Yamme on my 170 works great.
1977 Aquasport 170

February 08, 2007, 01:55:54 PM
Reply #5

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11278
(No subject)
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2007, 01:55:54 PM »
Quote from: "JimCt"
Only eight MPH faster than my 75???

You must have tested it on a strong tide  :lol:
Seriously, the hull is the key, it'll only do what the engineering will let it do.
Hey Bama, what speed on that 90?
Miquel, what do you get with the 115?
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

February 08, 2007, 02:12:28 PM
Reply #6

JimCt

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1848
(No subject)
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2007, 02:12:28 PM »
Once the hull's on plane there is no limit to speed.  Checked my speed with two runs 180 deg. apart to cancel out current.  Solid 32 in flat water.
JimCT
------
\'74 22-2 inboard
HIN:ASPL0953M74J
Chrysler 318
------
\'74 Marshall 22

February 08, 2007, 05:19:32 PM
Reply #7

Miguel

  • Information Offline
  • Panama
  • Posts: 292
(No subject)
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2007, 05:19:32 PM »
I´m just shy of 40mph with my 115, per GPS.  That was measured in a calm lake, I assume it would increase a bit on salwater.........
Miguel
1985 Osprey 170 / 1992 115HP Mariner
[/url]

February 08, 2007, 09:47:57 PM
Reply #8

Deck Daddy

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 74
(No subject)
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2007, 09:47:57 PM »
Had a 90 yamaha on my 17, ran a constant 33 with 2 people and dive gear.
One boat at a time.

February 08, 2007, 11:12:53 PM
Reply #9

NIGHTIDES

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 8
(No subject)
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2007, 11:12:53 PM »
Buddy's 17' was rigged w/ a 115hp. Did the trick and allowed him an extra punch in his pocket to get through the inlet in a following sea.

Having that 'extra' also allows you to run the engine easier and will extend the motor's life.

A happy engine  = a happy boater..

February 09, 2007, 05:36:41 AM
Reply #10

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11278
(No subject)
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2007, 05:36:41 AM »
On an older boat like mine, that was designed for a 70, the 115 is maxing the acceptable weight limits too.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

February 09, 2007, 08:27:36 AM
Reply #11

gw204

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 106
(No subject)
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2007, 08:27:36 AM »
Quote from: "RickK"
On an older boat like mine, that was designed for a 70, the 115 is maxing the acceptable weight limits too.


That's also a good point.  I'm sure if I choose to go with a 115 I'll have to rebuild accordingly (raise the floor a bit, foam core in the floor near the transom, etc.).  Weights on the 115 ETEC, Opti, 2-stroke carbed Yammy seem to be hovering around 360 lbs.

20" ETEC 90 - 320 lbs.
20" ETEC 115 - 369 lbs.
20" Opti 75/90/115 - 375 lbs.
20" Carbed Yammy 115 - 358 lbs.
20" Carbed Yammy 90 - 261 lbs.

261 lbs. on that carbed Yammy could be hard to pass up.

Thanks guys.   :)
Brian
St. Leonard, MD
1981 Mako 17
1986 Grady White 227

February 09, 2007, 03:35:50 PM
Reply #12

Bluesbrother

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 78
(No subject)
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2007, 03:35:50 PM »
Isn't the carbed Yammy 90 a 3 cyl engine? If so it will consume more fuel...
19.6 CC, T-Top, 115 HP Johnson 4 stroke, Continental All. Float on.

February 09, 2007, 05:29:08 PM
Reply #13

Pat Green

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 15
(No subject)
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2007, 05:29:08 PM »
Brian, I have a 1970 17 for about 25 years.  For the first 15 it had a 70hp Johnson which was adequate.  When I put a 120hp nissan it screamed(actually scared my wife). The extra weight caused some problems.  It started porposing which a set of trim tabs fixed. I used the fixed type and when adjusted they perform well (about $40).  Also, the new engine style covered both drain holes in transom, so I installed two new drains at floor level with scuppers because with the extra weight the boat was no longer self bailing.  Pat Green
1971 17 open fisherman

February 09, 2007, 05:37:27 PM
Reply #14

Pat Green

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 15
(No subject)
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2007, 05:37:27 PM »
Brian, I have a 1970 17 for about 25 years.  For the first 15 it had a 70hp Johnson which was adequate.  When I put a 120hp nissan it screamed(actually scared my wife). The extra weight caused some problems.  It started porposing which a set of trim tabs fixed. I used the fixed type and when adjusted they perform well (about $40).  Also, the new engine style covered both drain holes in transom, so I installed two new drains at floor level with scuppers because with the extra weight the boat was no longer self bailing.  Pat Green
1971 17 open fisherman

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal