Attention: Have 2 pages to see today

Author Topic: 1973 196 rebuild question  (Read 8604 times)

July 05, 2024, 10:47:28 AM
Reply #165

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #165 on: July 05, 2024, 10:47:28 AM »
I sanded the end off the center keel to put the drain in and it was in good shape, at least in that one spot, surprisingly. The hull was cored with balsa along the keel and that's the only reason I'm considering it.  Do you know if the balsa coring was factory or someone else's brainchild? There was a thru hull transducer in the back and the hull is so thin I f8gured more glass and core couldn't hurt but if it's unnecessary I won't do it. I think you're saying it's unnecessary.

July 05, 2024, 10:53:35 AM
Reply #166

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #166 on: July 05, 2024, 10:53:35 AM »
Just re read Ricky's reply and he said the same as you. That is what I'm doing. Thanks gentlemen.

July 05, 2024, 01:49:09 PM
Reply #167

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #167 on: July 05, 2024, 01:49:09 PM »
Dry fitted the stringers. I accidentally made my mold the wrong width, 5 inches wide instead of 6, but got lucky in that I left a small section of the stringers that necked down to 4 inches so they fit perfectly. Blind hogs and acorns and what not.

July 05, 2024, 02:20:54 PM
Reply #168

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11258
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #168 on: July 05, 2024, 02:20:54 PM »
Duff, seems you might be confusing yourself - maybe it's the heat  ;-)
Ulysses is talking specifically about the coring running down the center of the hull. Probe it in several places - if it's good, you're good.

I'm taking about glassing the stringers to the hull. As mentioned earlier, the boat is built in layers - first being the hull, next the stringers are fabbed out of the boat (maybe at that time subbed out?) and then the stringers are glued into the hull, next the liner is installed - liner could include the hull sides and cap as one (like my 170) or could be in pieces like yours, floor/casting deck, hullside/rod holders, cap.
The stringers are made with a mold and they connected the stringers to the hull with roving, a real PITA to grind down, as you found out.

You just need to grind down the roving about 6" out from the stringer and lam them down.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 05, 2024, 02:42:44 PM
Reply #169

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11258
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #169 on: July 05, 2024, 02:42:44 PM »
To answer your question about the thickness of the hull, it should be about 3/4" thick in the aft.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 05, 2024, 03:36:22 PM
Reply #170

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #170 on: July 05, 2024, 03:36:22 PM »
3/4 inch, huh? With the exception of where I laid glass to bond the transom to hull it's definitely not 3/4.  I am not questioning you. You clearly know what your talking about. Just so iam clear, about two feet in front of the transom, next to the keel should be 3/4 inch thick? That is really disconcerting. Mine is max 1/4 inch,  when you step on it, which I have been avoiding, it flexes considerably. I just assumed when the stringers were glassed back down it woul stiffen the whole thing up.

Next to transom, it's probably close to 3/4 is that where you are talking about? Also did you include the 24 Oz roving ad, as in use this or is that some sort of pop up? Never mind, I get it, that is the PITA stuff I ground down already.

Did you happen to see the coring question about whether that was factory or someone else's idea.  I understand Ulysses said it is waste of Coosa, I'm just curious at this point.

July 05, 2024, 03:37:57 PM
Reply #171

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #171 on: July 05, 2024, 03:37:57 PM »
As always thank you for your time. I am after all a complete stranger to all of you. You're very gracious with your time and knowledge. Thanks.

July 05, 2024, 04:03:53 PM
Reply #172

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11258
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #172 on: July 05, 2024, 04:03:53 PM »
Yes, thickest at the transom and tapers down to maybe 3/8" and then as you move forward you stay at about 1/4". Hull sides are thin, like 1/8".
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 05, 2024, 05:18:35 PM
Reply #173

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11258
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #173 on: July 05, 2024, 05:18:35 PM »
3/4 inch, huh? With the exception of where I laid glass to bond the transom to hull it's definitely not 3/4.  I am not questioning you. You clearly know what your talking about. Just so i am clear, about two feet in front of the transom, next to the keel should be 3/4 inch thick? That is really disconcerting. Mine is max 1/4 inch, when you step on it, which I have been avoiding, it flexes considerably. I just assumed when the stringers were glassed back down it woul stiffen the whole thing up.

Glassing the stringers to the hull bottom will stiffen it up. That's why we tie everything together with layered overlapping cloth to make it "one".

Next to transom, it's probably close to 3/4 is that where you are talking about? Also did you include the 24 Oz roving ad, as in use this or is that some sort of pop up? Never mind, I get it, that is the PITA stuff I ground down already.

I used the screen shot of the roving to show the kind of glass they used to join the stringers together and to probably build up the thickness there also. You can see the roving all through the boat.

Did you happen to see the coring question about whether that was factory or someone else's idea.  I understand Ulysses said it is waste of Coosa, I'm just curious at this point.
I did see the coring question but I have not seen added coring in original manufacturing. I've seen where they added coring to add a thru hull raw water pickup or a transducer but not big chunks . Hope that answers your question.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 05, 2024, 05:48:01 PM
Reply #174

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #174 on: July 05, 2024, 05:48:01 PM »
Indeed it does. Thanks.

Here are some more pics for future restorers and personal motivation. That is not a party sock in the pic but rather a vinyl glove which are better than nothing but nowhere near as good as latex (surgical gloves).  Have a great weekend all.

July 05, 2024, 05:53:10 PM
Reply #175

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #175 on: July 05, 2024, 05:53:10 PM »
Forgot, first pic is two more layers of 1708 down the middle and out the hull on either side of keel.  The pieces were 50 inches long and 25 wide, so approximately 25 inches on transom and 25 on hull. Did a couple more c9rner pieces.  The best roads in AL, like hwy 25, are a series of pot holes. I suspect my boat will be similar.

July 05, 2024, 06:44:12 PM
Reply #176

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #176 on: July 05, 2024, 06:44:12 PM »
Here is actual outline of 1708 laid down

July 07, 2024, 03:05:37 PM
Reply #177

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #177 on: July 07, 2024, 03:05:37 PM »
Perhaps the last layer of glass? Before and after. Overlapped withe previous 25 inch wide sheet under the stringer which I think is a good thing but I don't why.

July 07, 2024, 05:35:50 PM
Reply #178

Duffy1470

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 275
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #178 on: July 07, 2024, 05:35:50 PM »
Last two lam8nations overlapped the following way.

July 08, 2024, 05:39:54 AM
Reply #179

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11258
Re: 1973 196 rebuild question
« Reply #179 on: July 08, 2024, 05:39:54 AM »
Now you have clean glass to tie your stringers into.  :great02:
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal