Attention: Have 2 pages to see today

Author Topic: RickK's 170 rebuild  (Read 75342 times)

July 19, 2016, 05:13:41 AM
Reply #1290

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11283
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1290 on: July 19, 2016, 05:13:41 AM »
Getting mighty close Rick!  Can't wait to see it running!
Yup, me too.  Just waiting for the parts now.
Next is to figure out the best way to mount the hydraulic hoses so I can tilt the engine without breaking the fittings.  I may have to try to re-pull one of them through the other rigging tube - that will be tough as it's pretty full.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 19, 2016, 04:57:03 PM
Reply #1291

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11283
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1291 on: July 19, 2016, 04:57:03 PM »
Has anyone used a vertical "T"?


I am not sure if that is a cap on the one end or what.  I would think they just moved the bleeder nipple to the middle?
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 19, 2016, 08:22:52 PM
Reply #1292

dirtwheelsfl

  • Information Offline
  • Master Rebuilder
  • Posts: 808
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1292 on: July 19, 2016, 08:22:52 PM »
Don't see why one of those wouldn't work...

July 20, 2016, 08:29:09 AM
Reply #1293

Blue Agave

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 1495
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1293 on: July 20, 2016, 08:29:09 AM »
Shouldn't be long now, when do you anticipate the maiden voyage?  How long has it been Rick?

1975 19-6
3.0 EFI Mercury 150 4S
"Don't count the days make the days count." - Muhammad Ali

July 20, 2016, 09:11:09 AM
Reply #1294

love2fish

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 638
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1294 on: July 20, 2016, 09:11:09 AM »
Has anyone used a vertical "T"?


I am not sure if that is a cap on the one end or what.  I would think they just moved the bleeder nipple to the middle?


that's what I have on mine- but I have mine with the "center" fitting as my attachment point on the cylinder and then the breather valve on one of the sides- hose goes on the other side. looking for a pic...
Chris
\'74 22-2
Member #921

July 20, 2016, 10:11:47 AM
Reply #1295

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11283
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1295 on: July 20, 2016, 10:11:47 AM »
Shouldn't be long now, when do you anticipate the maiden voyage?  How long has it been Rick?
Been too long.
Hope to start the motor this weekend - the fire extinguishers are ready  :86:
Then I have to get the console in and she'll be ready for a shake down.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 20, 2016, 10:14:56 AM
Reply #1296

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11283
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1296 on: July 20, 2016, 10:14:56 AM »
Has anyone used a vertical "T"?


I am not sure if that is a cap on the one end or what.  I would think they just moved the bleeder nipple to the middle?


that's what I have on mine- but I have mine with the "center" fitting as my attachment point on the cylinder and then the breather valve on one of the sides- hose goes on the other side. looking for a pic...
I have a new set of the regular ones - I will try re-arranging the breather to see if it can be installed vertically.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 20, 2016, 12:22:51 PM
Reply #1297

love2fish

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 638
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1297 on: July 20, 2016, 12:22:51 PM »
did I miss a picture or post where you explained the clearance problem? not sure where/what your issue is specifically.
Chris
\'74 22-2
Member #921

July 20, 2016, 01:20:02 PM
Reply #1298

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11283
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1298 on: July 20, 2016, 01:20:02 PM »
This is where I learned of a potential problem - so since I haven't installed the hoses yet I'd investigate a solution
Finally got everything hooked up and I think ready to go for the first trial run.  Trying to get out tomorrow to a  local Lake and run around for a bit.  I've got to get time to get to a place in clearwater and get a replacement steering bleeder tee fitting that I broke off.  FYI hydraulic steering,  narrow splashwell,  Jack plate,  and a motor that is capable of tilting up really far will break off the fittings for the steering. 
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 20, 2016, 01:41:03 PM
Reply #1299

love2fish

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 638
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1299 on: July 20, 2016, 01:41:03 PM »
ahh gotcha
Chris
\'74 22-2
Member #921

July 20, 2016, 02:11:10 PM
Reply #1300

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11283
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1300 on: July 20, 2016, 02:11:10 PM »
I'm thinking on mine that since the hoses want to connect at a 45 (at least the way mine tighten), the hoses may put undue stress on the "T".  If I can come off straight up maybe that will help. Too bad they don't make a fitting that swivels and still has a bleeder nozzle on it.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 30, 2016, 06:46:49 PM
Reply #1301

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11283
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1301 on: July 30, 2016, 06:46:49 PM »
For you experts on older Johnson/Evinrude that have a water pressure gauge - where did you put the water feed tap?  I put it on the starboard side in a plug hole above the lower cylinder.  We get water out of the hose but no pressure on the gauge.  Now we are wondering if the gauge is good even though we can blow compressed air into it and the gauge moves. Maybe it was stuck?  We'll try again next weekend.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

August 01, 2016, 12:19:44 PM
Reply #1302

akbridge

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 260
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1302 on: August 01, 2016, 12:19:44 PM »
One thing I have done to get a reading on my WP gauge is to put a restrictor at the point that it exits the cowling.  Don't close off the water completely.  Maybe down to a .100" hole.  I have done this with drip irrigation tips, cuz, well that is what I had and it worked!

August 01, 2016, 04:57:50 PM
Reply #1303

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11283
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1303 on: August 01, 2016, 04:57:50 PM »
One thing I have done to get a reading on my WP gauge is to put a restrictor at the point that it exits the cowling.  Don't close off the water completely.  Maybe down to a .100" hole.  I have done this with drip irrigation tips, cuz, well that is what I had and it worked!
So these old motors just don't have much pressure?
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

August 10, 2016, 09:33:25 AM
Reply #1304

akbridge

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 260
Re: RickK's 170 rebuild
« Reply #1304 on: August 10, 2016, 09:33:25 AM »
As far as I can tell.  All my Evinrude/Johnson engines have gone up to 20 psi.  As a test you could temporarily block the hose for the existing pee hole and see what your water pressure does. 

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal