Attention: Have only 1 page to see today

Author Topic: 222 ccp  (Read 3191 times)

June 26, 2013, 02:54:13 PM
Reply #15

tx ranger

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 24
Re: 222 ccp
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2013, 02:54:13 PM »
and my first born

June 26, 2013, 02:56:53 PM
Reply #16

Capt. Bob

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Global Moderator
  • Posts: 6446
Re: 222 ccp
« Reply #16 on: June 26, 2013, 02:56:53 PM »
This is what you are looking for so....

viewtopic.php?p=92912#p92912

"Pipebender" visited the Forum on 15 June so you may try a PM to him and see if it still is out there.

Good luck.

Here's another, newer posting. Doesn't mention center or side console nor a trailer but.....

viewtopic.php?p=106042#p106042

It's in the Bradenton area so you probably get a member to at least get some pics and ideas on finishing. Then again you may not want a project but that might be difficult to find on a model this old.
]
Capt. Bob
1991 210 Walkaround
2018 Yamaha 150 4 Stroke
"Reef or Madness IV"

June 26, 2013, 03:24:00 PM
Reply #17

tx ranger

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 24
Re: 222 ccp
« Reply #17 on: June 26, 2013, 03:24:00 PM »
thanks capt. bob, that's exactly what i'm looking for.

this one is supposed to be a '77 24ft, top cap looks different though...?
http://1977aquasport200mercefiv6.shutte ... ures/46#41

Also, I'm trying to wade through information on the porta brackets & armstrong on here. i've never seen anyone running one of these porta brackets in the galveston area... they look flippin amazing. wouldn't both of these bracket types be added leverage on the transom? are these only used when factory transoms are beefed up? i get the differences, pros and cons, I just don't know how to tell if it's a good route, structurally. do tell

June 27, 2013, 06:16:46 PM
Reply #18

tx ranger

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 24
Re: 222 ccp
« Reply #18 on: June 27, 2013, 06:16:46 PM »
anyone?

June 27, 2013, 06:58:34 PM
Reply #19

love2fish

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 638
Re: 222 ccp
« Reply #19 on: June 27, 2013, 06:58:34 PM »
I think while the armstrong is added leverage/torque on the transom- just like the Porta Brackets- if you get the swim platforms on either side- you can spread that strain out a bit more- making the most difference in turns. The Armstrongs are also sealed/ compartments, (on the bottom) so they are going to give you some added flotation while at rest.
Chris
\'74 22-2
Member #921

June 28, 2013, 03:56:23 AM
Reply #20

Tx49

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 141
Re: 222 ccp
« Reply #20 on: June 28, 2013, 03:56:23 AM »
Quote from: "tx ranger"
answered my own question.
http://mahoganybay.net/store/components ... ochure.pdf

if someone runs across one of these 240 cc's for sale, I'll sell my farm and my liver...  :salut:

You looking for a boat or a hull?
Johnny

Success belongs to the Team, Failure belongs to the Leadership.

1970 Aquasport 240 CC SeaHunter


June 28, 2013, 08:12:01 AM
Reply #21

tx ranger

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 24
Re: 222 ccp
« Reply #21 on: June 28, 2013, 08:12:01 AM »
TX, I'm down for either one, but i'd prefer some flavor of project.

July 01, 2013, 08:21:28 AM
Reply #22

tx ranger

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 24
Re: 222 ccp
« Reply #22 on: July 01, 2013, 08:21:28 AM »
why, you have one?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal