Classic AquaSport

Aquasport Model Rebuilds, Mods, Updates and Refreshes => Osprey Style Hull Rebuilds => 165/170/175 Rebuilds => Topic started by: Deacon on February 20, 2019, 04:29:16 PM

Title: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on February 20, 2019, 04:29:16 PM
Just joined maybe a couple weeks ago. I appreciate you allowing me to join. Too many in projects in motion, but I took on another since I just couldn't pass up bringing back to life a boat that I first started to run around on when I was a kid.

So, here's the 1970 170 I picked up. (hopefully this pic posts and that I did it correctly)

150 Mariner on her transom... can't wait to hoist that off, check to see if she runs and sell her, likely aiming for a 90 zuk 4-stroke in that 350lb range, unless something more appealing comes up.

Planning to hoist that soon (need to get chain hoist or cherry picker first) before tearing into a horribly soft sole and a transom that desperately needs replacement.

Already reupholstered and used some Nautipoxy/Nautithane on the old teak from the Todd flip-seat and in process of patching some old holes on the console in prep for re-gelcoating.

Then, of course, the dirty work... seeing what's under the lid :)

Looking at some of your work on projects, I'm amazed... thank you for sharing the knowledge/wisdom. Thanks in advance for any insight you want to share on this project!
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on February 21, 2019, 06:44:44 AM
Welcome aboard Deacon.  The hull looks to be in great shape. Use this approach when posting pix - you upload them to your free photo gallery and then follow the instructions here to post them https://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=12725.0
When you say "seeing what's under the lid" what are you referring to? Any pix of the inside?
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on February 21, 2019, 09:48:50 AM
Thanks Rick, I'll definitely follow the photo instructions... thanks for steering me in the right direction.

The hull is in ok shape... some glass work necessary in 1 spot.

When I mentioned "seeing what's under the lid," I meant the sole and potentially the whole cap... hoping I don't have to tear the whole thing off. Currently planning to measure sole width at various points forward of stern (in case cap sides shift after sole is extracted), then cut sole leaving a 1" flange that I can reinforce and use as a guideline / support for a new airex sole (thinking 12oz glass beneath, 2x17oz above) on top.

While sole is out, planned to:
1) extract what I assume will be waterlogged foam from stringers, retab as necessary, etc, add vertical riser to each stringer to account for increased sole height.
2) mount two stern to console pvc pipes for cables, wiring etc and possibly a single one from console to bow locker
3) potentially extend stringers to tie into an integrated flotational bracket (debating this vs standard jackplate)
4) transom replacement (likely 2x 3/4" AB Fir) with full transom height (no notch)
5) transom knees for additional support
6) consider seating fuel tank beneath for greater stability, fueling safety (separating electronics from vent and fuel fill) and use of space under the console.

While I've searched a variety of projects that are documented, I didn't know if the group had concluded on the most efficient method to extract waterlogged foam from the trapezoidal stringers. Any thoughts on this or considerations on my plans above would be greatly appreciated.

Also, I'll share pics of the inside soon... probably would have been good to have had one with the old console and seat in (a before picture), but I jumped the gun and failed to capture.

Also, I finally got through looking at all of your work on your 170. Impressive work. Congratulations!
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on February 21, 2019, 05:22:03 PM
There are many ways to get the foam out - someone used a paint stirrer on a drill to break it up. Someone used a special shovel that fit in between the sides of the stringers. If the stringers themselves are still attached well, the usual method of exposing the foam is to cut the top off the stringer, leaving sections of the top to keep the stringer shape.
Does your boat have a liner in it? My boat was a 3 piece lamination - the hull, the stringers were set in place and then the liner was set in place using bonding putty.  My liner consisted of the casting deck, the floor, the transom cover, the inside finished gunwales with fishing rod inserts on each side and finally the gunwale tops . The front of the liner had the anchor line storage and the small cap for cleat and nav lights.  The liner floor/gunwales did not go all the way to the hullside, so measuring across the floor might give you some incorrect measurements.
Was the fuel tank inside your console?
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on February 21, 2019, 08:36:55 PM
Thanks Rick,

Was thinking a section off the stringer tops may be the best option... should be fun scooping and vacuuming foam particles out.

The boat is as you described yours, but the original owner must not have opted for the rod inserts... just flat side of the liner all the way forward... I'm fine with that. Trying to draw the line before cap removal by perhaps replacing the sole behind the casting deck first... this should give me the opportunity to tie the liner into the hull below the sole (perhaps some floor supports or bulkheads)... may even have me carving the sides out of the liner (but doubt it), inserting some ribs instead of bulkheads and leaving extra space... not quite sure where the path will lead at that point, but trying to keep it as simple as reasonably possible.

After dealing with area behind the casting deck, I can address the soft floor in that part, perhaps add some 2" foam to create an insulated fish locker with a real locker top seal, etc.

But overall, trying to avoid removing the cap and focusing on sole replacement, including casting deck.

Also, yes, the fuel tank was inside the console... oddly opposing my expectation, no odor or signs of pin-holes.

Looking forward to removing the engine this weekend and carving up the sole while also deciding which skin to carve out of the transom. Since the backside of the transom sandwich has some waves and holes and such (no value in really retaining to maintain straight line integrity), I'm thinking I could be better off removing the rear laminate and replacing from the outside in.

The real question after doing that is the bracket situation- if I extend, I can perhaps do a moments calculation to see how much variance there would be in the original fuel placement under console with the engine placement 17" or so back and set the fuel tank where it would need to be to counteract (while half full or so... and obviously under sole install)... the rest being somewhat the same, could be ignored.

Thanks again for contributing your thoughts. Cool part is I finally have most materials on hand right now to proceed, so excited and ready to get moving.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on February 22, 2019, 05:48:59 AM
Just aft of the casting deck on each side at sole level, you'll see a part of the liner that is between the sole and the gunwale liner, that seems to follow the hull itself (maybe about 18" long), going up slightly.  These parts of the liner are almost touching the hull, so if you're going to be cutting around the perimeter be careful you don't accidently cut through the hull in those places.
The first time I replaced the sole I cut around the perimeter with a skill saw leaving about 2" or the closest to the blade as I could.
Be advised that these 170 are very sensitive to weight being moved aft. I have approx 8" offset (jackplate plus spacers) and the boat acts totally different then it did before. I can't image a 17" offset. For one, you'd have to move the scuppers up a few inches to keep them above the waterline.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on February 22, 2019, 09:28:04 AM
Thanks Rick. I calculated the shift in CG (with some fuel capacity assumptions) being about a 3' shift forward of the fuel tank... so, you're absolutely right that a 17" shift would be too drastic, especially with a variable weight (fuel) shift that would get worse as you drain fuel. So, gone with that idea.

However, I do really want a full transom. So, I'll likely go with a hydraulic jackplate with 8" as you have. If my #s are correct, a shift forward of existing fuel capacity of about 1.5' should counter the 8" offset with a 350lb engine (targeting a 90 zuk). This would work fairly well in my opinion, especially if I were to consider increasing fuel capacity (creating an emergency capacity mainly used for ballast) and dropping it below the sole and shift forward. I'll recalc more exactly as I approach tank install / placement.

Also, huge thanks on the warning about cutting in the location you mentioned! Very much appreciate you sharing your thoughts and experience on this project. Itching to get my hands on it after work today, hopefully pulling that beast of a 150 Mariner off her back.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on February 22, 2019, 03:37:40 PM
I have a Seastar Hyd steering system on the 170. I have a 6" JP and then found out from members that you can shear off the hydraulic lines when tilting the engine so I added a power pole adapter (.5") and 1.5" spacers which brought it out to just over 8".  I also had to change the hydraulic hose connections to stick straight up.  Works great now.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on February 22, 2019, 11:40:58 PM
Thanks again... I'll look into the Seastar... I know I have a learning curve to advance on that note, especially as it pertains to full transom closely rigged steering and such... I've dealt with inboards, I/Os, and straight transom mounts only thus far. Spoke with the company I expect to buy the zuke from and they claim 8" is enough to make it work coming out a bit to gain the adequate radius... makes sense especially since I can customize re-entry obviously. I need to advance learning curve to envision it all.

In the meantime, some fun I figured I'd share in prepping the workshop- materials area, glass rack, engine mount.

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/5-_Airex_Divinycell_etc.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18131&title=start&cat=860)

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/6-_Glass_rack.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18132&title=start&cat=860)

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/7-_Engine_mount.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18133&title=start&cat=860)
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on February 26, 2019, 01:36:45 PM
Continuing to prep the shop... ordering marine ply, etc, building engine hoist (below)

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/8-_Engine_Hoist.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18140&title=gutting-26amp-3b-engine-hoist&cat=860)

Boat's transom was one of the worst I'd ever seen... can't say it didn't cross my mind a few times staring at her whether I'd lost my mind.

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/9-_Almost_gutted.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18141&title=gutting-26amp-3b-engine-hoist&cat=860)

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/10-_Almost_gutted.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18137&title=gutting-26amp-3b-engine-hoist&cat=860)

What a cool idea... instead of actually mounting the hydraulic pump for the trim tabs, just carve into the center stringer and stick it like a flower in a foam block... wonderful arrangement  :shocked:

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/12-_Hydraulic_pump_for_Trim_Tabs-_Nice_mount.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18139&title=gutting-26amp-3b-engine-hoist&cat=860)
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on February 26, 2019, 03:02:19 PM
Yup transom looks soft. The problem with the old Ospreys there was no place in the aft to store anything. They should have run hydraulic hoses in the trough up to the pump in the console but the old consoles were packed with the fuel tank and didn't have any room in them.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on February 26, 2019, 03:38:35 PM
Transom is wet mush... everything through-bolted came out sopping wet with rot. You're right about the console... very little room with that tank in there. First transom replacement ahead and I'm rather certain I'll have a good bit of stringer work, let alone foam removal. Thanks again for being a 2nd set of eyes, Rick.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on February 26, 2019, 08:19:54 PM
I planned my tank to be under sole and that is one reason I built my own stringers and notched them to fit the 27 gal belly tank I found. When I decided the placement of the tank I knew I was in too deep ..... but everything worked out ok - lots of work.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: larsli68 on March 21, 2019, 04:04:04 PM
Your transom looks very similar to what mine did. I drilled out the wood (big job...) and used Seacast instead of plywood. I'm very happy with the boat.
Been using it for 4 seasons now.

//Lars
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on March 22, 2019, 09:21:12 AM
Lars,

Thanks for sharing... I've thought about Seacast and would use it but I'm fearful that the years have abused the outer laminate so badly (my straight-edge cringes as I lay it against the transom... just too wavy especially where the oversized 150 made its mark) that I need to do an outside-in transom replacement. I've faced that fear and about to do it.

While this isn't a budget project, I am going to go with a marine ply transom replacement (2 x 3/4") and possibly some knees for additional support.

Now that I've finally got the old Mariner off, I'm carving out the sole today to see what wonderful stringer condition I have... likely carving out stringer tops as well to get to the foam.

After foam removal, it's time to work in parallel a bit with fuel tank sizing and placement (currently aiming as far forward along casting deck, but potentially restructuring casting deck to allow integration for outboard weight and 8" jackplate) along with transom work, where my current thoughts are to:
- carve out about 1' of the cap (trying to go without lifting cap off) that I'll replace with stern storage boxes (small tackle box slots, etc) and temporarily use gap to access transom
- tack in a transom frame to avoid shifting
- carve out about 1' from stringers
- carve out transom leaving 1-2" rear laminate lip
- clamp waxed melamine board to transom
- begin exterior skin and core replacement (1 csm then multiple 17oz layers before core... obviously integrating into hullsides and hull with overlapping lengths)
- interior skin (similar to ext skin)
- stringer reattachment
- storage box completion (inner supports will act as transom knees)

Please feel free to poke holes in this plan... I'm all ears! Thanks!!
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: wingtime on March 22, 2019, 11:49:38 AM
Wow that thing had a 150 on it!  :shock:

Way too much power and that stern must have set REALLY low in the water!

I have a 90HP Ocean Pro on my 170 on a manual jack plate.  Perfect match for weight and power.  At 301 lbs I would not want a single pound more weight back there though.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on March 22, 2019, 06:31:40 PM
Sounds like you've done your reading homework. :thumleft:  If you only allow 12" of working space, when you're tying in the transom core (front side) to the sides and bottom, you will be down to maybe 2,4,6" overlays, maybe not even that.  Might want to cut back the cap, liner sides and stringers back 18" so you have some room.  You can glass them back together later. Don't forget the PVC pipe:
Here is a link to where I explain the thought of the PVC pipe
http://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=13148.msg133124#msg133124

Here is a link to where I show what is actual problem
http://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=13148.msg133556#msg133556

Here is a link to Hawgleg's rebuild that shows the PVC pipe installation to keep a drain at the new low point of the boat
http://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=13148.msg134262#msg134262
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on March 22, 2019, 10:43:42 PM
So, yes Wingtime, it actually had a 150 on her.
Rick- yes, I've been reading for years :)... ready for 18" carve-out... probably the better idea... may still do it. I'd only expected a 12" tie-in, but may carve out 18" to suit both the depth of tackle drawers and extra support... only reason I'm thinking 12" is the fact that I'll have twin knees tied in as well. Just off the cuff, I was expecting a 1" overlay of CSM (non-structural), 3" overlay of 17oz, 6" 17oz, 9" 17oz, CORE, then additional 3 that should bring me back to around 11" with core embedded. If you all don't mind, let me know your thoughts if you don't think that's enough.

Turns out stringers were crud... crushing under my own weight... sad they're that bad. I'll likely tear out and redo but I'm considering running lateral structural supports to "splint" them and move forward. Debating on replacing with vertical 1" stringers verse restoring trapazoidals.

Some fun pics from today:

Amazing what you'll find!- "Pride of the Carolinas" Pepsi soda, and a child's lifejacket!??
(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/19-_Sole_removal.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18185&title=sole-26amp-3b-transom-removal&cat=860)

Coming along... takes longer than anticipated:
(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/20-_Sole_removal.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18186&title=sole-26amp-3b-transom-removal&cat=860)

Stringers horribly delaminated:
(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/21-_Sole_removal.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18187&title=sole-26amp-3b-transom-removal&cat=860)

Thanks again for your valuable input! Much appreciated!
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: larsli68 on March 23, 2019, 04:25:12 AM
I totally agree with you. If it's that abused, I would have done the same thing. Mine had a small crack at the top, which I removed to get to the wood anyway. Removing the wood is something I wouldn't want to do one more time anyway...
It was a tough job...
Great progress!

//Lars
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on March 23, 2019, 05:25:32 AM
3" overlap (3,6,9) is fine. Working in the 12" area is the tough part.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on March 27, 2019, 03:01:22 PM
Some updates from a lunch session today :). Decided on a few things:

Stern tackle / storage stations: carving out 16" between transom and sides... enough room (thanks Rickk for the feedback on that) to overlay glass for transom replacement and fits what I wanted for storage in the form of box length. Planning to tack some 2x4's across the boat to hold form before I make the stern cut & casting deck cut.

Jackplate and full transom concept- abandoned... while I felt I could manage around it, the hydraulic jackplate rise and full transom height won't allow it (yes, some of you probably already knew that... thank you for your patience as I reached this decision) unless you shift to a Porta-bracket, at which point you're dealing with a 17" minimum offset. While my calculations indicate that may be feasible if you max out forward shift of the fuel tank and increase fuel capacity to nearly double (or add some fresh water ballast), I felt I was about to engineer in a problem for little to no benefit, so planning on 25" transom enclosed by full transom height storage boxes on the side... small seating option & bilge access hatch in the middle.

Fuel Tank Placement- researching the multitude of tank options, I finally just headed over to the shop today and measured whether the existing tank (24x14x18") would effectively fit in the space that will formerly be casting deck storage... yes, it will, kind of... casting deck wall will have to be shifted back a few inches but it's trashed anyway... I'll put in a bulkhead, extend casting deck aft, add a hatch forward of the tank and regain storage. If my calculations are correct, the shift from original setup with a 270lb engine and standard fuel configuration to a 350lb 4-stroke and 26gal of fuel in that position will leave me with COG 3/4' forward of the original setup... so hopefully she'll be in a position, with the slightly raised sole, to self-drain without water coming flowing back through scuppers... of course, low fuel will shift this but I'm no longer worried about additional engine weight.

Stringers- completely trashed aside from a large portion of the center. I think this 170 may have been used to jump tanker waves at some point... complete carnage. Fortunately, I got a call from the marine ply guys this am and was able to add to the order before it went out. I'll see if I can salvage the center stringer up to the new casting deck bulkhead and I'll likely do 3/4" AB fir outer stringers, adding some floor supports as well.

Finally, no kids sports games this weekend... possibly a full-fledged "get-er-done" weekend.

Thanks again for your feedback!

Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on March 31, 2019, 08:55:17 PM
All this work and she's totally not rotten  :shocked:....

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/22-_Transom_removal.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18216&title=sole-26amp-3b-transom-removal&cat=860)

Slightly wet :)
(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/23-_Transom_removal.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18217&title=sole-26amp-3b-transom-removal&cat=860)

Alright... she's rotten all the way through... and even too the gunwale. Unfortunately, I couldn't carve out the rest... my Fein multimaster burned out after a month... seems odd since I wasn't pushing any limits. I'll clearly be checking on their warranty and general customer care... I'll keep you posted if you're interested... sure has been a fine tool during the very short time I've worked with it... until now.

On a different note, Poly Iso mold time. Aiming to create a hatch forward of the original casting deck hatch... planning to epoxy, then apply multiple coats of pva, non-wax gelcoat, a couple layers of csm/polyester resin to satisfy curves and such, layer of 1200, csm, 2x1200, csm, gelcoat... hope that's not overkill... have to monitor gap to surface distance on gasket ridge.

Thinking about a piano hinge from the diagonal side since forward width will be 12" and rear 30"... too much for a 12" hinge.

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/24-_Forward_hatch_mold.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18218&title=sole-26amp-3b-transom-removal&cat=860)

Thanks again for your insights and feedback!
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on April 04, 2019, 09:22:37 PM
Transom is finally out. Hammer and flathead used to chip out the old wood around the edge. Hoping the sun will soak up the rest of the moisture and leave it easier to sand without gumming up. Thinking a dremel and the normal sanding barrel may be useful in the corners.

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/25-_Transom_removal.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18237&title=sole-26amp-3b-transom-removal&cat=860)

Also, finally finished routing the foam for the forward hatch, epoxy, PVA and no-wax gelcoat (glass to be layed in tomorrow)... This being the first hatch I've made, I already see some mistakes that make me cringe. At first, I thought leaving what I presume to be aluminum film would keep a smoother edge, but it tore away inconsistently... this being foam I received for nearly nothing, I took what I could get to experiment and thus the alum film version. However, I'm proceeding to see what I get, thinking I'll be able to sand the gelcoat and work around some inconsistencies. Also, learned quickly not to over-apply PVA... thinking this hatch may look like the swamp thing when it comes out, but hoping otherwise.

Currently, looking at gasket types to lay on top of the ridge and envisioning a 1/2-3/4" wide neoprene strip (smooth surface face down to ridge) with small ridges in the topside surface, offering a more variable compression across the width that contacts the hatch... perhaps I'm being picky and I supposed I can do that myself, but thinking that would be beneficial.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts or feedback.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on April 05, 2019, 07:35:35 PM
Great progress. There is no value in saving the upper portion of the transom on each side.  So you have the inner portion of the transom to remove from the hull bottom/sides and to cut the top rear off at the 2" guide that you have cut all around.  Then its grind city to scruff everything up in prep of new glass.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on April 30, 2019, 09:34:01 PM
A bit of time unfortunately... had to coach some girls lacrosse and get some other work done.

With the ply in, patterned with some hot glue

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/28-_Transom_replacement.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18337&title=transom-replacement&cat=860)

cut some pieces

(http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/data/860/29-_Transom_replacement.jpg) (http://www.classicaquasport.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=18338&title=transom-replacement&cat=860)

and wondering everyone's thoughts on whether I go through the following process or another:

- Lam Polyester- overlapping 1st CSM, then 3x 17oz
- Epoxy for inner bridging the boards together- wetting out each, lightly clamping together
- Lam Polyester- overlapping 1st CSM, then 2x 17oz, last CSM... gel, fair, gel

Other thoughts...
- planning on using waxed Melamine (probably buffed turtle wax) as a dam on the stern
- planning to fill hard edges with polyester filler (aerosil, milled fiber, resin)
- peanut butter with trowel for skin to ply bridge... bolted with vegi iol sprayed through bolts to tighten.
- clean edges, hopefully seeping with peanut butter to be displaced to gaps or removed for next laminate ease

Would love to hear thoughts to shift direction or to confirm. Thanks!
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on May 01, 2019, 03:58:12 AM
You can certainly do exactly what you have planned out with poly. What I would do is not get so caught up in the total plan and take it one step at a time so you don't get overwhelmed. 1st get the melamine clamped to the transom and get the outer transom skin in (this is a big milestone) and prepped for the next step which is fillets and then fit the wood core (what you just cut probably won't fit like you have it because of the fillets added and the thickness of the glass and resin).
So get the transom skin in and then go to the next step.
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on May 01, 2019, 07:27:52 AM
Thanks Rick...  good to know the poly method will do the trick and your other thoughts certainly help as well... I was rather worried about whether the bond will be sufficient especially when I see so many using Vinylester or Epoxy on transoms.

No issue with being overwhelmed, however... I'm enjoying this. We get so much rain here in the Atlanta area that I'm forced to plan ahead. Outside of other rain-related issues of course, I seriously have to be selective about when I tack up the melamine to ensure it's not swollen by rain before I move forward. I'd heard we just recently had our first week without rain since Sept of '18.

Thanks again for the feedback!

Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: RickK on May 01, 2019, 10:42:20 AM
Here is an example of a pro using poly
https://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=9991.0
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: Deacon on May 03, 2019, 10:47:30 AM
Rick, that is very helpful! Read the whole thread... much appreciated!
Title: Re: 1970 170 Rebuild
Post by: thill on June 02, 2020, 02:29:29 AM
Poly will work well, especially on the fresh wood.  Just make sure to roughen all existing glass with heavy grits, wet out carefully, and roll out all trapped air.

Any recent progress?
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal