Classic AquaSport
General Aquasport Forums => Aquasport Discussion => Topic started by: D'SHOW on November 06, 2013, 07:38:41 PM
-
Hello. I am new to the forum. I live in the Caribbean, Puerto Rico, and just bought an Explorer 275 2000. I have a problem with her and would like to see if there any advise. It seams that no matter how much i trim her, she tilts to the one side, then I trim her again and will tilt to the other side or the same side. I know i am not over trimming bc I have trim indicators. I would like to know if any body else has had this problem. I don't know if it has to due with my current trim tab size or the motors. She has Bennett tabs 12x9. I called Bennett for suggestion and of course the want me to by newer and bigger tabs, 12x16 to be exact. The motors I have are Mariners EFI 250 with 4 stainless steel blades. Same people are suggesting to change to 3 blades. Any suggestions??
-
First question. With tabs all the way up, when you get over the hump and on plane, how does the hull react, right after you get on plane?
-
Stable
-
As I get to 3,300 rpms, and specially if I have a few more rpms in one engine than the other, the problem starts. I can actually level the boat out by accelerating the motor that is on the side that is leaning.
-
Do the engines sound synchronized at speed? Is there a chance one tach is off?
Also, are the motors counter-rotating or are they both turning with normal rotation?
BTW - the number of blades on the props won't make much, if any, difference...
-
D, sorry...Welcome aboard!
The 275 is a very stable hull. While most "lists" occur from imbalance, I don't think that's your issue. What I would be looking at is the hull bottom, aft...for hooks, both sides. If the hull bottom has distorted due to improper support, the hull being pulled green from the mold, whatever, hooks will develop at the transom...basically built in, permanant trim tabs.
That's my opinion...
-
Thanks for the info will look into that. Could the current tabs 12x9 be to small?
-
Engines are counter rotation. One does not sound faster than the other.
-
Thanks for the info will look into that. Could the current tabs 12x9 be to small?
D, the point of my first question is that...under normal operation, the boat should NOT need tabs. That's why I asked about her behavior with the tabs fully retracted.
Do you have any ability to contact the previous owner? We call them PO's, you'll see that a lot here. If you can, ask him about the handling characteristics.
-
Does she list to starboard? What are the engines alignment? I have found that alignment can contribute to a list condition. Are they towed in, out or neutral tow? Measure the distance between the prop shaft centers and measure the front of the gearcase bullet centers and see what the difference is. I have found that 4 blade propellers can contribute to a list depending on the manufacturer. Additionally, engine height can be a factor. Unless there is an abnormality in the hull bottom, I believe this can be solved with adjustments.
-
Farley may be correct. Engine height, with the 250 Mariners (Mercs in gray suits), should be second hole down from the top mounting hole.
-
If the tabs are mounted correctly I find it hard to believe it's them, if you distribute the weight in the boat right you shouldn't even need them, the boat should run fairly level, I'm with Farley on the motors.
-
Will cheque the motor mounts and will get back to you guys thanks for all the advise.
-
We never asked the question...to which side does she roll at speed?
Guessing port side.
Agree with the guys...it's not a tab issue.
-
Does she list to starboard? What are the engines alignment? I have found that alignment can contribute to a list condition. Are they towed in, out or neutral tow? Measure the distance between the prop shaft centers and measure the front of the gearcase bullet centers and see what the difference is. I have found that 4 blade propellers can contribute to a list depending on the manufacturer. Additionally, engine height can be a factor. Unless there is an abnormality in the hull bottom, I believe this can be solved with adjustments.
One of things I learned to do with mine with non counter rotating 115's was how to counter act a running list with engine trim settings. Mine wanted to list to port at cruise speed. So I would bump out the trim on the starboard engine very slightly and it would pull down the starboard side and pick the port side back to level. One of the things I did was make stainless steel tilt pins from round stock and had the base trim angle exactly the same when trimmed in so I had a baseline to work from. Now with trim tabs you have the ability to make minor adjustments by bumping down the port tab (if it lists to port) and pick up the port side back to level. I still think you can adjust your way out of the list.
-
Here is a question. Which trim tab rocker switch are you pushing to trim out the list? Remember they are cross wired (they should be anyways).... so if you push the top of the port side switch the starboard side tab will extend. Also there is a delay in the time for the tab to deploy and then for the boat to react. Bennett has a great set of instructions on their website on how best to use trim tabs.
Bob, How do the Bennett trim indicators work? I mean how do they "know" what position the actuator actually is in?
-
Wing,
I realize you are addressing SB but the the indicators are just that, an indication as to the % of the tab position relative to the total travel of the tab. The actuator has a sensor (rheostat) that measures the change in position of the shaft. It's similar to the fuel gauge we all know and love but works much better.
Like the fuel gauge, accuracy (I'm guessing is good) is really secondary to its intent. Rather it's used as a reference point for adjusting your tabs. I use mine on takeoff for the best possible hole shot. After planing, I adjust the tabs via boat attitude (port or starboard list correction) and tachometer reading. My flow scan also comes into play but that's another story.
I find that in calm seas that my best running position is indicated by 4 lit "leds" on port and two on starboard but that can (and often does) differ with changing conditions. Again adjustments are made via visual boat position and engine speed/trim. I'll then look at the lights as a reference point.
-
CB, always feel free, after all, we're both Bobs...
Bob is right, basically a percentage of deflection. However, and Tom may agree/disagree here, I always felt the "old" style trimdicators were not a true representation of where the tabs really were. After installing and testing 100s of tabs systems, I really knew how long it took for Bennetts to fully extend...and the bar graph and digital readout on the trimdicators always went faster than the tabs were actually moving. So in that respect, where the tabs are as opposed to where the trimdicators say they are, well, that was subject to debate IMO...
The "new" trimdicators are basically identical to Lencos. No more digital readout, just a series of lights in a vertical orientation on each side of the switch. On Lencos, I found this depiction to be MUCH more accurate in regards to true tab position. I would assume the same on Bennetts, although I have yet to work on a boat with the new style trimdicator.
Bruce is of course correct in regards to how tabs are wired. The concept behind the switch (people have trouble with this) is NOT what the tab is doing, but what the boat is doing. That's why the switches are labeled "Bow Down", "Bow Up", not "Port Tab Down", "Port Tab Up".
So all that being said, I wanted to add some things. The 275 hull was and is a stable platform. When it was introduced in, I want to say '99, it was the biggest boat by far in the AS lineup that we had seen, as the 270 and the 290 were no longer being built when I started there. So of course, amongst employees, it got our attention. Quite a bit of testing was done on the first couple boats before she went into production, make sure the engine heights were right, props right, fiberglass imbalances right, all that good stuff you do with a new boat. Never did we hear (and we would have heard) about the hull being "tender", about any listing issues, nothing...and we would have heard. Our good friend here DoubleTrouble (John) is the most vocal of the 275 owners here, and, unless he has a list and has just grown accustomed to it, has never said anything about any listing issues on his boat. Nor have any of the other 275 owners, at least not that I have read.
It's my opinion, and mine only, that, while adjusting for the list that D'SHOW is experiencing may solve the issue, to me, the adjustments are compensating for something that is inherrantly wrong with his hull. That's why I asked if he could get any info from the PO (or even the dealer he bought it from, if that's the case) as to how she ran in her previous life. If the motors have been raised to improve performance (along with the addition of 4-blade props for better bite), well, this COULD have a detrimental effect on handling, so we'll have to wait and hear from D'SHOW as to what holes the engines are mounted in. If they are 3rd or 4th hole down (maybe even 5th, can't remember how many holes Mercs (Mariners) of that vintage had), then we'll suggest bringing them back up to the 2nd hole (lowering the motors). If that doesn't fix the problem, then I really feel, as I described earlier, that there is something going on with the hull bottom that is causing the list.
With Farley's boat (and possibly Scotty's 22-2), I can easily see where (2) standard rotators will jack the starboard side up due to the upward thrust of the props rotating CW. But with CRs, that phenomena would be canceled out.
Of course, I could just be dead a$$ wrong on this one...
-
I guess what I was asking is if there is a sender in the actuators that gave you the trim position indication. Sounds like that is the case.
-
That is true SB, the twin standard rotation engines jack the starboard bow up, portside down.
As Farley says bow roll to either side is easily remedied by trimming up one engine.
-
Bruce, the upper portion of the actuator has a coil in it, with a rod protruding down through the center of the coil into the lower portion. As the rod moves up and down with the action of the actuator, the change in strength of the magnetic field of the coil is what is measured, and translated into a display...at least that's what I draw from the construction. The rod has "cut" marks so the trimdicator kit can be used with all existing Bennett actuators, you just shorten the rod to fit your actuator..
-
Bruce, the upper portion of the actuator has a coil in it, with a rod protruding down through the center of the coil into the lower portion. As the rod moves up and down with the action of the actuator, the change in strength of the magnetic field of the coil is what is measured, and translated into a display...at least that's what I draw from the construction. The rod has "cut" marks so the trimdicator kit can be used with all existing Bennett actuators, you just shorten the rod to fit your actuator..
So I could retrofit a indicator to my 245 if I desire. cool.
-
Yepper. The top of the actuator threads onto the actuator body. Unscrew the old, screw on the new one (have to enlarge the hole where the hose passes through to route the lead into the boat), and wire it up. With your HDS-7, you can have the tabs displayed on your head unit...http://www.bennetttrimtabs.com/indicators.php?cID=2 (http://www.bennetttrimtabs.com/indicators.php?cID=2)
-
Yepper. The top of the actuator threads onto the actuator body. Unscrew the old, screw on the new one (have to enlarge the hole where the hose passes through to route the lead into the boat), and wire it up. With your HDS-7, you can have the tabs displayed on your head unit...http://www.bennetttrimtabs.com/indicators.php?cID=2 (http://www.bennetttrimtabs.com/indicators.php?cID=2)
Unscrewing the old, at times can be difficult but that aside, you will need to drill a separate hole to feed the lead through. IIRC the sensor wire is sealed in the back of the actuator and is rather fragile. The wire will be crushed if you tried to bend it and feed it through the nipple hole. Granted, you could indeed drill a very large hole to span both the nipple and wire or possibly notch the area between the wire and nipple.
Then again, I could be wrong. I'll have to look at an old actuator.
-
It's been a while for me CB. In other words...I can't remember what the backside of the mounting pad looks like! BTW, do you have the old style or the new?
-
With your HDS-7, you can have the tabs displayed on your head unit...http://www.bennetttrimtabs.com/indicators.php?cID=2 (http://www.bennetttrimtabs.com/indicators.php?cID=2)
That would be totally bitchin' !
-
BTW, do you have the old style or the new?
SB,
I'll go out on a limb and say I have the old style based on the fact I purchased them in 96.
The sensor is still the same as the original but as you indicated, Bennett has upgraded the "Trimdicator" indicator. My original was the LCD model and eventually suffered from excessive exposure to the sun (much like its owner).
When I transferred the tabs to the WAC from my CCP, I replaced the indicators with the updated LED model. The new actuator with the sensor (I broke the wire leads on the originals when removing) fit the old actuator perfect and I'm guessing it's still the same.
That's pretty trick that they can be hooked up to the Lowrance.
-
Yeah Bob, you DID have the old style...
I was probably unclear earlier in my reference to Lencos. With Bennetts, you have a choice of having a separate indicator while maintaining the traditional Bennett rocker switch, or you can get the switch with the indicator built in, which is basically the same as the Lenco indicator switch.
What me personnally would think would be REALLY helpful to a lot of owners is a graphical representation, taken from a side view, of the tabs in relation to the hull. I think most owners would like to look at a display which is in effect a "picture" of where their tabs are, instead of a number representing percentage of deflection. One look, and the answer to the question, "I wonder how far extended my tabs are?" would be answered. JMO, once again...
-
Well my good Aquasport friends. I chequed the engines and they are mounted on the second hole. But, did notice the bothe engines are mounted 3/4 of an inch towards port from center line. My 270 lists port. Could this be the problem and if it is could it be fixed?
-
Well my good Aquasport friends. I chequed the engines and they are mounted on the second hole. But, did notice the bothe engines are mounted 3/4 of an inch towards port from center line. My 270 lists port. Could this be the problem and if it is could it be fixed?
D, one question. Where did you get your measurement to determine the boat's centerline? Centerline is ALWAYS determined by measurements taken from the hull, NEVER the deck.
-
Well my good Aquasport friends. I chequed the engines and they are mounted on the second hole. But, did notice the bothe engines are mounted 3/4 of an inch towards port from center line. My 270 lists port. Could this be the problem and if it is could it be fixed?
That could be an issue!!!!
Famous THT quote "Looks tippy!" would apply here. If they are truly offset that much the hull would constantly be trying to correct itself while moving through the water.
Pull motors, repair former holes, template, re-drill, re-mount.
-
Not so fast Lewis, we need to know if the centerline was pulled from measurements off the deck or off the hull. Reason being, decks can be moved all around the hull flange to make the 2 big parts fit together. Rarely will you see the gaps between the deck flange and the hull flange the same from one side to the other. Since the hull (keel) doesn't change regardless of how the deck fits/shifts/whatever, it is imperative that the centerline location be taken from hull measurements only. While 3/4" is a lot, we still need to know where he took his measurements from.
There are typically 2 ways to find the center, providing the motors aren't hung yet. One is to have a co-worker (or buddy) hold a straight edge up against the hullside. Hold a tape measure against the straight edge, then make a mark that is evidently past the center. Do the same from the other side of the hull, then split the difference. The second way is to securely tape the end of a tape to the chine radius. Hold a pencil securely against the tape an draw an arc such that somewhere in the middle of the arc, it crosses over the "estimated" centerline. Do the same on the other side of the hull, where the 2 arcs intersect is your centerline.
With the engines in the way, obviously determining centerline is much more difficult. A wood block cut into a right triangle with the angle opposite the height of the triangle being the deadrise angle would do it. Hold the block up to the hull such that the very tip of the base if even with the keel, then take a square, align with the base, and draw a line straight up.
-
Well, i am back. Did a few thing to de 2000 explorer. Its better but I still have problems. I got some tab indicators ( to benable to know exact position of tabs). I got bigger tabs and the difference helps alot. I also got more practice using the 275 and when going againsg the wages, i tilt the motors plenty up wich helps me eliminate the tilt problem. She eats the waves for brackfast. I love how she handles now. BUT, my God, for som reason i cant control her when I am going with the waves in the back. When driving with the waves a d the current, the deep vee seams to be terrible. I put my trims up, tilt some the eangines, but She is impossibble to hand. Little 21 footers pass me being all stable in the water and my boat tumbling from side to side. Is this normal???? Does anybody have any suggestions?
-
Hello. Still have problems with
The
275. Cant get her navigating well. Wondsring if over powered and big 4 blade props could be cousing this