Attention: Have 2 pages to see today

Author Topic: Thin bottom?  (Read 1025 times)

July 30, 2019, 09:11:38 AM
Read 1025 times

Guthrie Boatworks

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 12
Thin bottom?
« on: July 30, 2019, 09:11:38 AM »
We are rebuilding a 196 1972. Removed deck,stringers, stern coring. The bottom seems very thin to me. We almost exclusively rebuild Privateers. I got in the boat and the bottom flexed a lot walking in it. Is this normal?

July 30, 2019, 09:41:29 AM
Reply #1

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11074
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2019, 09:41:29 AM »
When I was rebuilding my 170 I noticed a little flex when I had everything gutted, but not too bad. I lam'd a layer of 1708 over the entire inside of the hull (including sides) before starting the rebuild.  That stiffened it up.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

July 30, 2019, 01:18:23 PM
Reply #2

Capt. Bob

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Global Moderator
  • Posts: 6435
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2019, 01:18:23 PM »
Here's an early layup schedule (170). Probably similar to what you're seeing.(third paragraph below).




 As Rick did with his, many of the rebuilds we've seen here have added an extra layer or two on the inside of the hull.
]
Capt. Bob
1991 210 Walkaround
2018 Yamaha 150 4 Stroke
"Reef or Madness IV"

July 30, 2019, 09:36:23 PM
Reply #3

Guthrie Boatworks

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 12
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2019, 09:36:23 PM »
Thanks Capt Bob, that explains things. Think I'll put another laminate or two in the hull, it has made it 47 years with busting so we will give her a little love now.While removing the cap today I observed that the gunnel cap was fastened to the hull flange with pop rivets. That's a new one for me, all I've ever seen were fastened with screws or bolts. Looks like to me this boat would benefit from spray rails, any thoughts?

July 30, 2019, 11:06:47 PM
Reply #4

Capt. Bob

  • ***
  • Information Offline
  • Global Moderator
  • Posts: 6435
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2019, 11:06:47 PM »
I've seen pop rivets on an earlier model 170 too. Guess it was a Hialeah thing in those days. :salut:

Spray rails have come up before on the Forum but I can't recall if they have been installed. I'll do a search.

How about starting a thread on your group's rebuild? Pics are always appreciated.

Good luck. :thumright:
]
Capt. Bob
1991 210 Walkaround
2018 Yamaha 150 4 Stroke
"Reef or Madness IV"

August 01, 2019, 09:48:56 PM
Reply #5

Guthrie Boatworks

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 12
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2019, 09:48:56 PM »
How do I upload pics?

August 02, 2019, 07:38:06 AM
Reply #6

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11074
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2019, 07:38:06 AM »
If you want to post a pic when you talk about your boat, which you should, follow the instructions here http://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=12725.0  - don't attach them, this is better for viewing.
Spend a few minutes to absorb the instructions. It's really easy.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

December 30, 2019, 04:29:27 PM
Reply #7

GoneFission

  • Information Offline
  • Mechanical Master
  • Posts: 3479
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2019, 04:29:27 PM »
The earlier boats had a lot of variety in build quality.  Some had pretty thin hulls - others seemed to have another layer or two.  CCP hulls were generally heavily-bulit due to the expected offshore/rough water use.  Most of the "nice" rebuilds I've seen have an extra layer put in the hull bottom and up the sides as well.  The early 22-2 boats were thin in the hull sides.  An extra layer makes a pretty big difference on these boats, IMHO.    :2Cents:
Cap'n John
1980 22-2 CCP
Mercury 200 Optimax 
ASPA0345M80I
"Gone Fission"
ClassicAquasport Member #209


August 04, 2020, 01:57:59 PM
Reply #8

JCB196

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 2
  • USCG Licensed Captain, Fly Fishing Guide
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2020, 01:57:59 PM »
When I was rebuilding my 170 I noticed a little flex when I had everything gutted, but not too bad. I lam'd a layer of 1708 over the entire inside of the hull (including sides) before starting the rebuild.  That stiffened it up.
I am considering laminating the whole inside of the hull and stringers with 1708 structural glass on my 196. From what I've been told its the way to go to add durability to the hull, the downside to this is the planing surface under the foamed stringers will still be the original thickness and can cause a tear from the newly stiffened hull. I do intend to cut off the tops of the stringers and replace the foam and while I'm in there tab the stringers from the inside with matte tape and increase the thickness, rather gut stringers completely then 1708 the interior if the hull and make Coosa board stringers as recommended by a friend. Has any one done anything like this? My funds are limited so a full composite stringer rebuild is out of the question.   

August 04, 2020, 02:50:23 PM
Reply #9

Ulysses485

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 306
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #9 on: August 04, 2020, 02:50:23 PM »
When I was rebuilding my 170 I noticed a little flex when I had everything gutted, but not too bad. I lam'd a layer of 1708 over the entire inside of the hull (including sides) before starting the rebuild.  That stiffened it up.
I am considering laminating the whole inside of the hull and stringers with 1708 structural glass on my 196. From what I've been told its the way to go to add durability to the hull, the downside to this is the planing surface under the foamed stringers will still be the original thickness and can cause a tear from the newly stiffened hull. I do intend to cut off the tops of the stringers and replace the foam and while I'm in there tab the stringers from the inside with matte tape and increase the thickness, rather gut stringers completely then 1708 the interior if the hull and make Coosa board stringers as recommended by a friend. Has any one done anything like this? My funds are limited so a full composite stringer rebuild is out of the question.   

JCB196,

You make a very valid point.

I believe adding a structural layer of glass is always a good idea if you are staring at a bare hull during a rebuild. We have become much more demanding of hulls these days (towers, live wells, big in deck fuel tanks, heavy 4 strokes etc.). Reusing stringers makes it tricky to accomplish this however starting with a tape on the inside bottom of the stringer and then tabbing each inside of the inside stringer leg would be very similar in structural support. Another thought is to flip it, add a layer of glass to the bottom and do most of the finish work while you are there.

I am learning this stuff myself so this is mostly regurgitated from another build (of the many that i have read through ) so don't take what i say for fact. There are however, many ways to do things with fiberglass. 

Hope that helps.

Ulysses
1974' 240 CC - https://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=15975.0
1970’ Flatback 222 - https://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=15666.0
1981’ Osprey 22-2 - https://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=15249.0
1971’ Flatback 222 - SOLD
1972' 240 Seahunter - SOLD

August 05, 2020, 06:29:33 AM
Reply #10

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11074
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #10 on: August 05, 2020, 06:29:33 AM »
When I added the layer of glass to mine the hull was totally empty, no stringers or cap.
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

August 13, 2020, 10:43:24 AM
Reply #11

TimothyFaller

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #11 on: August 13, 2020, 10:43:24 AM »
I am considering a rework of my 17ft 1971 aqua Sport. The bottom seems thin and I like the idea of redoing from the inside. The boat yard tells me it is not worth the money. But I love this boat!  However it does not seem to match the pictures in this chain of posts. I have two clear ports that I can open in the stern floor that makes it look like there is a stringer down the middle where they connect for drainage out a drain plug in the transom.   Does anyone have any pictures of this model open so I can see what I might be getting into?

August 13, 2020, 11:29:58 AM
Reply #12

RickK

  • *****
  • Information Offline
  • Administrator
  • Posts: 11074
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #12 on: August 13, 2020, 11:29:58 AM »
Timothy, can you post a pic of what you're talking about?
If you want to post a pic when you talk about your boat, which you should, follow the instructions here http://classicaquasport.com/smf/index.php?topic=12725.0  - don't attach them - you are limited by file size. Uploading them into your "member gallery" is better for viewing.
Spend a few minutes to absorb the instructions. It's really easy. Remember if using a phone to take pics, to hold the phone horizontal with the lens to the left.

Here is how my stringer system looked on my '71 170




You might have what is called a "convenience pack"
Rick
1971 "170" with 115 Johnson (It's usable but not 100% finished)

1992 230 Explorer with 250 Yamaha

August 13, 2020, 01:05:28 PM
Reply #13

TimothyFaller

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #13 on: August 13, 2020, 01:05:28 PM »
Thank you.  It looks similar and I will get some pictures.  I have done any demo and I keep it covered when not being used so when I open it tomorrow I will take some pictures. Mine does not have the rod spaces on the sides. But otherwise looks similar. Do these pictures show the form removed or is the form in the spaces that are still covered?

August 13, 2020, 01:28:56 PM
Reply #14

TimothyFaller

  • Information Offline
  • Posts: 3
Re: Thin bottom?
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2020, 01:28:56 PM »
Pictures







 

SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal